#1
Posted: 5/21/05 at 4:54pm
What a disappointment. A success, yet a disappointment.
This movie blows big time. Great effects, some of the best action sequences I have seen, but otherwise, awful.
First of all - knock it off with the horrible vaudeville comedy. I'm talking about Yoda. He's a funny man, but the character ruins great action moments but using him as a segway into the next battle scene. You know what I am talking about. His poses and grunts. He is a character that we are supposed to respect, but he lost his dignity.
What's with the Tarzan call the Wookie makes?
HORRIBLE acting by Natalie Portman. SUPREME acting by Ian McDiarmid.
There was a plot with no storyline. I would have liked more drama. Anakin's transition to the darkside should have taken longer. But all of a sudden it was "you're my new master." I didn't get his need to turnover at all. The film was all battle.
We should feel sympathetic for Anakin, but we don't. We just think he's a moron.
Now when I think of a movie, I think of a beginning, middle, and end. This film obviously takes place in the middle of something, but even still, all other Star Wars films have had beginnings and ends. This one did not. It's ending signified something in the future - but the audience had no clue what it would be, unless they are familar with the Star Wars story.
Therefore, the film was an awful movie. However, it did not need to be a movie. It's part of a series - and that's why it is successful. It filled in the final gap.
Even though it was part of a series, I like a movie to work on its own as well. This did not. If you didn't know the story, nothing would make sense.
In the five other movies, the films worked on their own. This one was made merely to fill in the gap.
I would have liked the ending to be extended. Show us Yoda training Obi Wan to contact his former master.
Those are my scattered thoughts. I was entertained, just a bad movie.
This movie blows big time. Great effects, some of the best action sequences I have seen, but otherwise, awful.
First of all - knock it off with the horrible vaudeville comedy. I'm talking about Yoda. He's a funny man, but the character ruins great action moments but using him as a segway into the next battle scene. You know what I am talking about. His poses and grunts. He is a character that we are supposed to respect, but he lost his dignity.
What's with the Tarzan call the Wookie makes?
HORRIBLE acting by Natalie Portman. SUPREME acting by Ian McDiarmid.
There was a plot with no storyline. I would have liked more drama. Anakin's transition to the darkside should have taken longer. But all of a sudden it was "you're my new master." I didn't get his need to turnover at all. The film was all battle.
We should feel sympathetic for Anakin, but we don't. We just think he's a moron.
Now when I think of a movie, I think of a beginning, middle, and end. This film obviously takes place in the middle of something, but even still, all other Star Wars films have had beginnings and ends. This one did not. It's ending signified something in the future - but the audience had no clue what it would be, unless they are familar with the Star Wars story.
Therefore, the film was an awful movie. However, it did not need to be a movie. It's part of a series - and that's why it is successful. It filled in the final gap.
Even though it was part of a series, I like a movie to work on its own as well. This did not. If you didn't know the story, nothing would make sense.
In the five other movies, the films worked on their own. This one was made merely to fill in the gap.
I would have liked the ending to be extended. Show us Yoda training Obi Wan to contact his former master.
Those are my scattered thoughts. I was entertained, just a bad movie.
"The Spectacle has, indeed, an emotional attraction of its own, but, of all the parts, it is the least artistic, and connected least with the art of poetry. For the power of Tragedy, we may be sure, is felt even apart from representation and actors. Besides, the production of spectacular effects depends more on the art of the stage machinist than on that of the poet."
--Aristotle
--Aristotle