Skip to main content
Shop Merch Add a Show Listing
My Shows
News on your favorite shows, specials & more!
#1

Star Wars III Blows

What a disappointment. A success, yet a disappointment.

This movie blows big time. Great effects, some of the best action sequences I have seen, but otherwise, awful.

First of all - knock it off with the horrible vaudeville comedy. I'm talking about Yoda. He's a funny man, but the character ruins great action moments but using him as a segway into the next battle scene. You know what I am talking about. His poses and grunts. He is a character that we are supposed to respect, but he lost his dignity.

What's with the Tarzan call the Wookie makes?

HORRIBLE acting by Natalie Portman. SUPREME acting by Ian McDiarmid.

There was a plot with no storyline. I would have liked more drama. Anakin's transition to the darkside should have taken longer. But all of a sudden it was "you're my new master." I didn't get his need to turnover at all. The film was all battle.

We should feel sympathetic for Anakin, but we don't. We just think he's a moron.

Now when I think of a movie, I think of a beginning, middle, and end. This film obviously takes place in the middle of something, but even still, all other Star Wars films have had beginnings and ends. This one did not. It's ending signified something in the future - but the audience had no clue what it would be, unless they are familar with the Star Wars story.

Therefore, the film was an awful movie. However, it did not need to be a movie. It's part of a series - and that's why it is successful. It filled in the final gap.

Even though it was part of a series, I like a movie to work on its own as well. This did not. If you didn't know the story, nothing would make sense.

In the five other movies, the films worked on their own. This one was made merely to fill in the gap.

I would have liked the ending to be extended. Show us Yoda training Obi Wan to contact his former master.

Those are my scattered thoughts. I was entertained, just a bad movie.
"The Spectacle has, indeed, an emotional attraction of its own, but, of all the parts, it is the least artistic, and connected least with the art of poetry. For the power of Tragedy, we may be sure, is felt even apart from representation and actors. Besides, the production of spectacular effects depends more on the art of the stage machinist than on that of the poet."
--Aristotle
#2

re: Star Wars III Blows

Gee, Namo hasn't weighed in with his 1/2 cent yet? Suprising.
#3

re: Star Wars III Blows

Thank you so much for assuming your 'review' is so important that it deserves it's own thread, despite a very clearly marked thread about the movie being about five threads down the board.

#4

re: Star Wars III Blows

Thank you so much for assuming he assumed.....
#5

re: Star Wars III Blows

Usually, I would jump on myself and others for doing the same, Popa, but, I have had a very bad day - involving a 911 call - and I don't want to read 200+ posts in the thread to catch up. I already have a "Muppets Oz Blows" thread, so this is my "SW3 Blows" thread.

I'll spank myself for being bad. But those are my thoughts on the film.
"The Spectacle has, indeed, an emotional attraction of its own, but, of all the parts, it is the least artistic, and connected least with the art of poetry. For the power of Tragedy, we may be sure, is felt even apart from representation and actors. Besides, the production of spectacular effects depends more on the art of the stage machinist than on that of the poet."
--Aristotle
#6

re: Star Wars III Blows

"spank yourself"?

talk about being kinky....
#7

re: Star Wars III Blows

Good to hear. My friends, who are die-hard SW fans, thought it was brilliant. Then, I figued that they would probably say that even if the movie sucked.
#9

re: Star Wars III Blows

Well, if Star Wars III blows then that's a $50 million dollar blow right there...
#10

re: Star Wars III Blows

I am skitzo today.

Where is my life going, Namo?
"The Spectacle has, indeed, an emotional attraction of its own, but, of all the parts, it is the least artistic, and connected least with the art of poetry. For the power of Tragedy, we may be sure, is felt even apart from representation and actors. Besides, the production of spectacular effects depends more on the art of the stage machinist than on that of the poet."
--Aristotle
#11

re: Star Wars III Blows

Your life, CapnHook, is going to hell in one of Martha Stewart's most fabulous muffin baskets.


Twitter @NamoInExile Instagram none
#12

re: Star Wars III Blows

Just calling em as I see em. What effect that it has on you is of no concern of mine. At all.
Twitter @NamoInExile Instagram none
#14

re: Star Wars III Blows

What? this movie is a part of a 6 part series, of course it needs the other movies to make sense, especially since it is filling in all the missing pieces of all the other movies.

"It's ending signified something in the future - but the audience had no clue what it would be, unless they are familar with the Star Wars story."

ok, who hasn't seen the original star wars movies? or at least heard of them. the first movie is one of the most sucessfuly movies in history, so i doubt Geore Lucas had any doubts about being familar with the story. that's why they made a whole prequel trilogy to let people who saw the original trilogy knows what happened before that.
#15

re: Star Wars III Blows

Like I said, when I think of a movie, I think of a beginning, middle, and end. Say this was the ONLY Star Wars film. It wouldn't make sense. I think of all films independently. This film, on its own, would be missing chunks.

However it's part of a series, and made that way. Therefore it fulfilled its purpose.

Then again, all other 5 Star Wars films worked independently - still a sense of a "the story's not over yet" - but works on its own. All three Lord of the Rings films worked independently, too.
"The Spectacle has, indeed, an emotional attraction of its own, but, of all the parts, it is the least artistic, and connected least with the art of poetry. For the power of Tragedy, we may be sure, is felt even apart from representation and actors. Besides, the production of spectacular effects depends more on the art of the stage machinist than on that of the poet."
--Aristotle
#16

re: Star Wars III Blows

I have a real hard time accepting that either 'The Empire Strikes Back' or, for that matter, 'The Two Towers' can be taken independently. They're not meant to be taken as independent movies and they never were. They were clearly middle chapters of longer sagas and do not introduce or resolve their characters or stories the same way a self-contained movie would.
#17

re: Star Wars III Blows

Again, like I said, these films were not meant to be independent films. However, *I* like to look at ALL films as independent in judging a film. Independently, this film doesn't work. But it does work as part of the series.

Why doesn't this make sense to you all?
"The Spectacle has, indeed, an emotional attraction of its own, but, of all the parts, it is the least artistic, and connected least with the art of poetry. For the power of Tragedy, we may be sure, is felt even apart from representation and actors. Besides, the production of spectacular effects depends more on the art of the stage machinist than on that of the poet."
--Aristotle
#18

re: Star Wars III Blows

Oh, the theory makes sense, you're just invalidating your own understanding of it by suggesting that all the other 'Star Wars' movies and the 'Lord of the Rings' movies all would work indepenently when they quite clearly do not, nor were they ever intended to.

Updated On: 5/22/05 at 11:20 PM

#19

re: Star Wars III Blows

Being an 18 year old girl and having no knowledge of Star Wars (I've led a sheltered life,) I promised my bf I'd go see it if he sees Rent with me.

Anyhow, I thought it was...alright. Too many light saber fights gives me the same feelings as too much Quidditch: stoppppp already!!

I thought the movie was cheesy. Was the dramatic "NOOO!" really necessary? Was that scene of silence between Padme and Anakin really necessary? Blargh I say.

For a virgin Star Wars baby, I found it tolerable and well, sort of cool.

Conclusion: I like R2. And, Hayden can't act.
#20

re: Star Wars III Blows

Capn, your harping on a "well made" film is just silly in this instance. Attack of the Clones and Empire are definitely not self contained. Neither are Two Towers, Return of the King, Kill Bill 1 & 2. They aren't meant to be! They are a series! Sorry if that cramps your style, but in this instance, it is not the make or break issue for ROTS. The acting and writing in SW films is not the best--never has been. It's all about adventure and magic. And that's fine. It's not trying to be a serious art film!

I thought Episode III was fantastic. And is definitely at least the 2nd best SW film. And the reviews have been stellar.
johnraymondbarker.com
#21

re: Star Wars III Blows

Suck it did, younglings...
Sir Bedevere: ...and that, my liege, is how we know the Earth to be banana shaped. King Arthur: This new learning amazes me, Sir Bedevere. Explain again how sheep's bladders may be employed to prevent earthquakes.
#22

re: Star Wars III Blows

"Hayden can't act"

Rent "Life as a House." You will have a different opinion.
#23

re: Star Wars III Blows

I so unfortunately disagree. Hayden can't do anything right for me anymore.

That said, I think Episode III stands as one of the best of the 6 (I have to go with the reviewer who states it's 3rd after Empire and A New Hope).
#24

re: Star Wars III Blows

While Christensen was good in "Life as a House" and "Shattered Glass", he does nothing for me. Gimme Ryan Gosling any day of the week.
#25

re: Star Wars III Blows

Difference of opinion and taste.

HOWEVER, I must STRONGLY disagree that this film was NOT one of the best STAR WARS films in ANY point of view: independent movie or series movie.

Melodramatic (moreso than any other, except for the ending of the 70's/80's films.). Melodramatic, too much battle, no drama. Just pure spectacle. And HORRIBLE acting. Was even disappointed in the acting of EWAN! In the "YOU WERE THE CHOSEN ONE!!" scene. Natalie Portman was god awful. She did nothing for the film at all. R2D2 was better than her - and it's a robot. Perhaps they should have made a robot play Padamae's part in this film.

Enjoyable, yet awful.
"The Spectacle has, indeed, an emotional attraction of its own, but, of all the parts, it is the least artistic, and connected least with the art of poetry. For the power of Tragedy, we may be sure, is felt even apart from representation and actors. Besides, the production of spectacular effects depends more on the art of the stage machinist than on that of the poet."
--Aristotle

BroadwayWorld TV


Ticket Central
Hot Show
Tickets From $59
Hot Show
Tickets From $70
Hot Show
Tickets From $59
Hot Show
Tickets From $101