The Geometry Question for the Day.. — Page 2

Yup, I'm pre-med, that's why I'm doing orgo. The pre-med society (yes, we're dorks) are going to make shirts that say "the pre-med society, because misery loves company." Yeah, it's kind of hellish. I enjoy some of orgo, but the labs are just ridiculous. Eight hours is just too long. We have other classes...

I'm sorry you don't really like statistics. I took AP stats in high school and then my freshman year I took a seminar that examined interesting statistical paradoxes. It was actually rather enjoyable...They're fun. Maybe I'll post one some day.

Rodney--where are you? You can't just pose a question and then leave!!! (J/K, I just want to know if I'm right.)

---

Jess1483 and NYBroadwayNY are correct.

The others who said 2 are correct but their way of getting it doesn't work.

Remember the first rule of geometry is "don't look at the picture"

If you have a series of circles within squares, within circles, within quares like this, if you know the length of one side of a square to find the length of a side of the next smallest square simply multiply the longer length my the square root of one half.

Good, well, maybe I should have been a math major. Calculus killed that desire though... I decided that when you could have an entire question where there were no numbers, it stopped being math.

---

Thank you. I've been saying that all along...Hey, Rodney, we agreed on something!

---

If calc isn't math, no wonder I liked it better than analysis.