You know, I'm not sure. I think it's less than a year, but I'd have to take a closer look. I think in my copy, there are actually dates, but I don't think I brought it home. I shall get back to you, if you haven't found the answer yet.
I don't think that it goes to say that it's *true* that all gay men really defined themselves by their promiscuity, but that was one of the things that Larry Kramer did, and still does, vehemently condemn. His book Faggots, that was written before any of this, is about that as well - and he predicts that this promiscuity will ultimately be what kills many of them. It's scary, scary stuff. I think that line you're thinking of is a bit of hyperbole, a bit of truth; the way they were - in these clubs and such - was totally different than "other" people, you know? It was a way to set themselves apart. I'm not sure where my personal stance on it lies, though.
Raúl's take on Ned Weeks changed who I am. I mean that. He was able to grab me from the very start, and make that all so real to me, as it may never have otherwise been. The text alone is so impactful, but to have someone up there about whom I cared a lot made it a lot tougher to take.
A work of art is an invitation to love.
Updated On: 8/26/05 at 01:52 PM