WE MUST GET RID OF BUSH! — Page 2

zola, even though it goes againt my principles to share my ill gotten gains with one who fights against my getting it, i guess i'm willing to share the wealth in the hopes that it will seduce you over to the dark side.

---

That's the best offer I've had since someone said "I Ken Lay you." (I think it was Vish but I was in a vodka haze at the time.)

By the way, here's a great summary of those tax cuts I was referring to:

http://www.cbpp.org/4-23-04tax.pdf
http://www.cbpp.org/4-23-04tax.pdf>http://www.cbpp.org/4-23-04tax.pdf

---

He's a real poet.

---

Equity production contract rates apply.

---

As an openly Gay Man, I'm appalled finding "Bush" in my bed.

He's supposed to be there defending the Constitution, not modifying it to suit his own biases.

LMFAO.

Papa you are a bad influence.

---

I'd like to echo your point, JRB. The Constitutional amendment really is like having Bush pee in my cornflakes.

---

The whole Constitution amendment is pure pandering to the religious right. Nothing like attempting to insure a group of citizens never get the same rights....just so you can get your butt elected again.

Also, no fair saying "it will never pass," which it probably wouldn't. But since Bush is going to use it as a litmus test, I think it's pretty fair for us homos to ask the people in our lives what they think of Bush talking about the amendment as a litmus test of our own. Yes, it's pandering. But it's totally at our expense.

---

no i do not support the constitutional amendment. there are things that this administration supports with which i do not agree. i've made clear in many threads that i advocate a solution which removes the word marriage from all lawbooks and institutes civil unions as the law of the land. leave marriage to the churches.

while i understand that the amendment is a make or break issue for most of the people here (actually it's just one more bale of hay on and already collapsed camel), i find that there are enough other issues that define the race for me. perhaps if i truly felt that there was a possibility of such an amendent getting either 2/3 of both houses of congress and 3/4 of the states within a 7 year period or at all, i might be persuaded to champion a third party candidate. but while i feel it is craven politics, i believe it is just that, politics.

however, nothing would get me to support john forbes kerry.

---

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!

Namo, I ruv u.

---

Can I be the flower girl or maybe the "tit ring" bearer?

Let's see 'em, Dame.

No better disinfectant than sunshine. Let them see the light of day.

---