#26
Posted: 6/2/10 at 8:04pm
Frankly, I think this is ridiculous and is a slight offense to Spiderman's creator, Stan Lee. His book is not about this issue and if Spiderman were suddenly black it would have to be explained and have a reason for being beyond "oh, he's black now because there should be more black people in entertainment."
It's offensive to suggest that his character who got superpowers from being bitten by a radioactive spider could be black? You're gonna have to explain that one to me. Why does it have to be "explained" at all. Besides the fact that he originated as a white character in the comics, what about Peter Parker or Spiderman dictates that he not only HAS to be white, but that it's offensive if he's not? You'd have blown a gasket if you'd seen the Charlie Brown revival.
Changes are made all the time to the mythology of these characters. The Superman movies don't take place in the 30s, the Batman tv show and the movies take two totally different tacks with the material, Superman died in the comics, etc, etc.
Again, I see no reason why Spiderman has to be white and I've yet to see anyone make a real case for it in this thread.
It's offensive to suggest that his character who got superpowers from being bitten by a radioactive spider could be black? You're gonna have to explain that one to me. Why does it have to be "explained" at all. Besides the fact that he originated as a white character in the comics, what about Peter Parker or Spiderman dictates that he not only HAS to be white, but that it's offensive if he's not? You'd have blown a gasket if you'd seen the Charlie Brown revival.
Changes are made all the time to the mythology of these characters. The Superman movies don't take place in the 30s, the Batman tv show and the movies take two totally different tacks with the material, Superman died in the comics, etc, etc.
Again, I see no reason why Spiderman has to be white and I've yet to see anyone make a real case for it in this thread.