#26
Posted: 7/28/06 at 3:49am
The difference between the A Chorus Line revival and the Les Miserables revival is that there is a whole generation that has not been able to see a first-rate mounting of A Chorus Line with the original Michael Bennett staging (considered one of the best if not the best staging of a Broadway show) with the appropriate casting. I work at the drama & dance department of a university and although I know Baayork Lee has supervised countless of national and international productions, a great amount of our students are incredibly excited about the revival because they've never been able to experience A Chorus Line the way they believe they should, which is what this new Broadway production is going to do for them and other people like them. The show has been gone for about 16 years, so audiences who saw the original production are going to be nostalgic for it, and knowing it is going to be just like it was, they'd definitely be heading over to see it.
Les Miserables' original staging was obviously based on the idea of an epic spectacle. It wasn't anything groundbreaking and did not revolutionize Broadway in any way. Also, the show has been closed for 2 or 3 years of which it has been touring with the same exact creative team behind it. At this point anyone who wants to see it has seen it.
That is the major difference between reviving A Chorus Line by recreating Bennett's staging and bringing back Les Miserables after a mere couple of years.
Les Miserables' original staging was obviously based on the idea of an epic spectacle. It wasn't anything groundbreaking and did not revolutionize Broadway in any way. Also, the show has been closed for 2 or 3 years of which it has been touring with the same exact creative team behind it. At this point anyone who wants to see it has seen it.
That is the major difference between reviving A Chorus Line by recreating Bennett's staging and bringing back Les Miserables after a mere couple of years.
Updated On: 7/28/06 at 03:49 AM
