Different directors have different abilities and prioritize different aspects of the process. For me, as a producer, what I look for in a director is someone with range -- here meaning "the ability to work on productions of all sizes in all styles keeps one employed." One may be better at, say, intimate musicals than multi-million dollar spectaculars, or they may be able to handle musicals in general, but can't go anywhere near straight plays. That's perfectly fine, as long as they are capable of making the attempt, even if what they are attempting is not within their comfort zone. What they do outside their comfort zone may suck, but at least they attempted to expand the horizons of their versatility.
Aside from that, regardless of personal idiosyncrasies or different approaches to the process, directing is pretty much the same whether you're great at it or you stink on ice. As the late Tom O'Horgan once said, "If you think that when I direct a show I get some sort of divine inspiration... well, that's not the way it works. You try something because you've done everything else and it didn't work out. Directing is no haphazard thing; rather, it is a complex series of challenges and compromises."
Formerly gvendo2005
Broadway Legend
joined: 5/1/05
Blocked: After Eight, suestorm, david_fick, emlodik, lovebwy, Dave28282, joevitus, BorisTomashevsky, Seb28