#51
Posted: 10/16/08 at 10:07pm
My problem isn't with film-to-stage adaptations in general. It's in the recent ugly trend of adapting a film purely for its popularity. So very blatantly. Just looking for a "sure financial bet." These adaptations merely take exactly what you already know, add a few forgettable songs, and sell it to you as "a wonderful, expensive, artistic theatrical experience that you already know." When, in fact, it's nothing more than a touring arena ice show landing in a better Zip code.
Shows like 9 to 5, Shrek, Young Frankenstein, Saturday Night Fever, Footloose, Mary Poppins, Tarzan, Legally Blonde and others offer little more than a Xeroxed screenplay with so-so songs "forced" into them. Hell, they don't even trim the scripts. Many of them just add in the songs, which makes some of them clock in at around 3 hours. Tell me, does the story of "9 to 5" really take around 3 hours to tell?? Is it that epic?? No, it's not. It's just an unimaginative, paint-by-numbers approach to the source material. It's "banal" sold as "Broadway's best."
I don't mean they all have to be obscure films or non-mega-hits, but certainly the reason to adapt the following for the stage would be largely an artistic one, far more than trading in on an established popularity:
Sweet Charity
A Little Night Music
Passion
Nine
Grey Gardens
And sometimes popular films can be adapted (and I mean truly ADAPTED not Xeroxed) for the stage with a fresh, creative vision (like The Lion King).
So, I'm not tired of film-to-stage adaptations in general. Not all of them.
I'm tired of this modern trend of "Xeroxing" a popular movie for Broadway.
It sucks.
Oh... and I don't think "Once" falls into this category of "Ugh, not another one!" It wasn't that popular of a movie. So, I hope they will actually ADAPT it for the stage.
No more Xeroxing, please.
Shows like 9 to 5, Shrek, Young Frankenstein, Saturday Night Fever, Footloose, Mary Poppins, Tarzan, Legally Blonde and others offer little more than a Xeroxed screenplay with so-so songs "forced" into them. Hell, they don't even trim the scripts. Many of them just add in the songs, which makes some of them clock in at around 3 hours. Tell me, does the story of "9 to 5" really take around 3 hours to tell?? Is it that epic?? No, it's not. It's just an unimaginative, paint-by-numbers approach to the source material. It's "banal" sold as "Broadway's best."
I don't mean they all have to be obscure films or non-mega-hits, but certainly the reason to adapt the following for the stage would be largely an artistic one, far more than trading in on an established popularity:
Sweet Charity
A Little Night Music
Passion
Nine
Grey Gardens
And sometimes popular films can be adapted (and I mean truly ADAPTED not Xeroxed) for the stage with a fresh, creative vision (like The Lion King).
So, I'm not tired of film-to-stage adaptations in general. Not all of them.
I'm tired of this modern trend of "Xeroxing" a popular movie for Broadway.
It sucks.
Oh... and I don't think "Once" falls into this category of "Ugh, not another one!" It wasn't that popular of a movie. So, I hope they will actually ADAPT it for the stage.
No more Xeroxing, please.
"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Updated On: 10/16/08 at 10:07 PM