The Tribune review rang a little more true to how I felt about the show, but I thought both were a bit more than kind. Notice how neither mention the choreography/er? Something you would expect to be in the forefront of an Elvis catalogue musical, wouldn't you think? I thought there might be some mention of the mysterious motorcycle angels that appear for no apparent reason, but perhaps they've been cut. And how about the intellectual blond bombshell who mysteriously shows up in a portable art museum (complete with dancing statues), who draws LESS attention than the unremarkable and blandly dressed James Dean figure on the motorcycle? Or the most conservative character who wants to rid the town of promiscuity is surrounded by lascivious young boys and scantily clad babes during her second act solo? It seems as if there is a decent show somewhere in there, but it looks like a case of too many cooks. Methinks a dog has been thrown a couple of bones...
EDIT: My apologies...the Sun Times did mention the choreography was "deft".
"What can you expect from a bunch of seitan worshippers?" - Reginald Tresilian
Updated On: 1/16/05 at 06:08 PM