Boycott?

[Elphaba3]

Posted: 11/19/04 at 4:48pm

Why are people boycotting Seth Rudetsky?

[Mattio98]

Posted: 11/19/04 at 4:50pm

WHAT????

Why would people do that???

[Elphaba3]

Posted: 11/19/04 at 4:53pm

I dunno. People implied something about that the other day. I personally Seth a-mah-zing!

[VeuveClicquot]

Posted: 11/19/04 at 5:00pm

Why are you posting something like this? Who is boycotting Seth, and more importantly, why?

It is not only ludicrous to post a thread like this without explaining where you got this information from, it is potentially hurtful to the reputation of Mr. Rudetsky.

Mr. Rudetsky has done yoeman's service for the American musical theatre for years. He doesn't deserve this kind of inane treatment. If you have a problem with him, at least do him the service of explaining the problem, so he (or others) can defend himself.

[Type_A_Tiff]

Posted: 11/19/04 at 5:03pm

I have no idea who Seth is, but judging from this statement:

"I personally Seth a-mah-zing!"

...I don't think Elphaba3 should be the one you're attacking.

[CattleCall]

Posted: 11/19/04 at 5:10pm

I believe the boycott issue was brought up by andyf in the thread about Rosie O'Donnell being at chatterbox. care to explain yourself, andyf? i'm curious!

[andyf]

Posted: 11/19/04 at 5:15pm

Wow.

Before this gets any more out of hand, I think I should explain.

So, I'm the person in question, just to clear that up and there isn't an actual boycott. I said I was "boycotting" him just meaning that I was upset with him. I am not in fact boycotting Mr. R. I was referring to a joke with luvWicked and I guess I forgot how things love to get blown out of proportion around here; but I can realize that if you're not familiar with my lingo, you could have - and in fact did - take it completely wrong. And that's not your fault, but it happened nonetheless.

It was a bad idea to post something like that, but not any worse than "post[ing] a thread like this without explaining where you got this information from," or even just asking me what I meant.

There's no actual boycott and now no one needs to be attacked.
Yes?

EDIT: CattleCall I guess you posted while I was writing.
EDIT: And I guess Elphaba did, too.

Updated On: 11/19/04 at 05:15 PM

[Elphaba3]

Posted: 11/19/04 at 5:15pm

Yeah really, don't shoot the messenger! I'm just saying what I've heard. Sorry if that offends anybody.

[Elphaba3]

Posted: 11/19/04 at 5:18pm

Oh ok. Thanks for explaining. I'm new here so I didn't know.

[Elphaba3]

Posted: 11/19/04 at 5:18pm

double post Updated On: 11/19/04 at 05:18 PM

[CattleCall]

Posted: 11/19/04 at 5:40pm

thanks for the info, andy! i feel better now :)