#1
Posted: 10/23/04 at 8:29pm
It occurred to me:
I think it's funny that one of the harshest criticisms Simon Cowell can offer an American Idol contestant is that they are "too Broadway" and yet one of the harshest criticisms Ben Brantley has to offer a Broadway show is that it is too "American Idol."
I think it's hilarious that both Broadway and American Idol think that the other is terrible and the opposite of what they stand for.
What's even MORE ironic is that Simon has NO PROBLEM letting one of his recording artists, Tamyra Gray, come to New York City and star in one of the hokiest unacclaimed shows on Broadway!
Meanwhile, Jennifer Hudson, Frenchie Davis, and Justin Guarini are either on Broadway, preparing to come to Broadway, or hoping to be on Broadway. And there will be MORE TO FOLLOW in the years to come. In fact, American Idol has become a very nice platform for young performers to become Broadway stars. In fact, I'd recommend young talent to work their darndest to get on that show. In a matter of weeks, you become a household name and can sell tickets to a Broadway show whether you win the contest or not. Kinda reminds me of how young undiscovered talent made it big with an appearance on the Ed Sullivan Show.
Why are Broadway and AI picking on each other so much? They're both about making money and giving birth to the dreams of young aggressive talents. Both have the wrong idea about the other. When Simon sees a bad singer, he says "go to Broadway. You'd be great there" and us Broadway fans cringe, thinking "no, you don't get it. Real Broadway performers are wayyyyy better than that singer." But I think Ben Brantley and the rest of the NY theater critics have the same misunderstanding. Comparing a Broadway show to "American Idol" shouldn't be considered a criticism. American Idol is an EXTREMELY LIKEABLE and SUCCESSFUL television show. If BROOKLYN is truly comparable to "American Idol," then it should prove to be a hit with audiences all over the world.
Yes, American Idol is a TV show that can be watched for free while Broadway's tickets cost $100 (sometimes more). And yes, Broadway is about theater and storytelling while American Idol is closer to a karaoke contest. Nonetheless, both are more exciting, popular, and rich with talented performers than they are willing to acknowledge about each other.
I think it's funny that one of the harshest criticisms Simon Cowell can offer an American Idol contestant is that they are "too Broadway" and yet one of the harshest criticisms Ben Brantley has to offer a Broadway show is that it is too "American Idol."
I think it's hilarious that both Broadway and American Idol think that the other is terrible and the opposite of what they stand for.
What's even MORE ironic is that Simon has NO PROBLEM letting one of his recording artists, Tamyra Gray, come to New York City and star in one of the hokiest unacclaimed shows on Broadway!
Meanwhile, Jennifer Hudson, Frenchie Davis, and Justin Guarini are either on Broadway, preparing to come to Broadway, or hoping to be on Broadway. And there will be MORE TO FOLLOW in the years to come. In fact, American Idol has become a very nice platform for young performers to become Broadway stars. In fact, I'd recommend young talent to work their darndest to get on that show. In a matter of weeks, you become a household name and can sell tickets to a Broadway show whether you win the contest or not. Kinda reminds me of how young undiscovered talent made it big with an appearance on the Ed Sullivan Show.
Why are Broadway and AI picking on each other so much? They're both about making money and giving birth to the dreams of young aggressive talents. Both have the wrong idea about the other. When Simon sees a bad singer, he says "go to Broadway. You'd be great there" and us Broadway fans cringe, thinking "no, you don't get it. Real Broadway performers are wayyyyy better than that singer." But I think Ben Brantley and the rest of the NY theater critics have the same misunderstanding. Comparing a Broadway show to "American Idol" shouldn't be considered a criticism. American Idol is an EXTREMELY LIKEABLE and SUCCESSFUL television show. If BROOKLYN is truly comparable to "American Idol," then it should prove to be a hit with audiences all over the world.
Yes, American Idol is a TV show that can be watched for free while Broadway's tickets cost $100 (sometimes more). And yes, Broadway is about theater and storytelling while American Idol is closer to a karaoke contest. Nonetheless, both are more exciting, popular, and rich with talented performers than they are willing to acknowledge about each other.