For a lot of reasons, the producers of "Chicago" have needed to find "unorthodox" choices for pivotal roles. Granted, some of those choices have been more successful than others. People will constrantly belittle some of those choices. But the plain fact is that "Chicago" has done what is necessary to keep the show operating. Obviously, that is not to everyone's liking...but the show has prevailed for 15 years +..while countless of other musicals have bitten the dust. I've seen "Chicago" a few times (twice on tour and 4 times on Broadway). I've been lucky to have seen the show, close to the stage. It's exciting seeing the action so closely. Speaking of the West End Chicago....it's always sad to see a show end its run after so many years. I hope that the Broadway Chicago lasts as long as possible. It gives joy and excitement to a lot of people...not to mention the employment it provides to cast, crew, orchestra, theatre staff, etc. I don't even want to think about a Broadway w/o "Chicago." from RC in Austin, Texas
"Noel [Coward] and I were in Paris once. Adjoining rooms, of course. One night, I felt mischievous, so I knocked on Noel's door, and he asked, 'Who is it?' I lowered my voice and said 'Hotel detective. Have you got a gentleman in your room?' He answered, 'Just a minute, I'll ask him.'" (Beatrice Lillie)