Having seen Part Two, "Shipwreck" in London, I can say the glaring difference was something you already alluded to, which is the differing portrayal of Herzen. Dillane, in London, played the character as a more dominating force, whereas O'Bryne is more subdued. He does a wonderful job with the character, but I see him as more of a base and foundation of the show, rather than a outstanding player. Because of this, I do enjoy O'Bryne's Herzen better, the three plays being such an ensemble piece, he takes a role with many, many lines and does a respectable job with it, without stealing the show.
Hawke and Crudup, not having as many lines as O'Bryne, take what they have and exploit it (in a good way) to the best of their abilities. Every line they have is memorable and sticks out in your mind. In Stoppard's writing sense, they are the characters which spur the action and create chaos, whereas Herzen is the on who reacts to it all.
"Are you sorry for civilization? I am sorry for it too." ~Coast of Utopia: Shipwreck
Updated On: 1/1/07 at 12:30 PM