such a silly topic...
On the boards I think people are just lazy and dont want to type out someones full name so if its a topic about Hairspray and you say Harvey, one would hope the person reading the topic could reasonably conclude whom you mean given the context of the discussion.
In person sometimes you introduce yourself by your first name to someone and theyre chatting with you so first names work, and its not like they need you to remind them of their own name anyways so how often would you really be compelled to use it talking to the person. (Wow you go to that school? I went there and loved it!)
-If theyre not making light conversation then theyre probably the kind of person who likes their distance so a last name use might seem more polite. (Ms ___ do you mind if I take a picture?) Its really just a vibe in this case.
If its two people talking to each other outside a stagedoor about some performer then clearly they both know who theyre talking about so theres no need to qualify further with a last name.
The overall decrease in formality is not just a strange occurence here... for example the formal tense I was taught in Italian classes is not as common now as it was 10 years ago either.
Broadway Legend Joined: 11/9/04
It's not weird at all. It's just a common mistake.
Typically, when you discuss one performer in a thread, it is fine to refer to them by their first name. If the thread is about Julia Murney, saying "Julia" would be fine.
However, as we often do with famous playwrights, presidents, historical figures, etc. - or even a citing in an essay - after the first time of saying both their first and last name, you use their LAST name only.
I think most people just don't know to do that.
Generally, it's kinda rude to address someone face-to-face by their first name unless you know it's appropriate. Although that has fallen by the wayside, and now only the bank regularly call me Miss [Surname]. Which I don't mind too much, but it is a shame.
I think if it's clear who you're referring to, then it doesn't hurt to drop a Greg or a Laura as long as the context is such that people know who you mean. You're discussing them on a message board, not interviewing them for a job.
Whenever I'm discussing a performer, I generally try to start off with their full name, then drop down to just one name once I've established who I mean. And I usually drop down to surname for guys, and first name for girls. Not consciously, it just happens.
Didn't we used to call ordinary stars by their last names?
I don't mean icons like Patti, Bernadette, Cher, Liza and Diana. I mean actors like Benanti, Menzel, Lane, Broderick, Graff, Groff, Bundy, Butz, Gaines and Pascal.
So, I guess I do think it's different now. I don't yet know why.
In person, I don't think it hurts to err on the side of politeness so I use Mr. or Ms. ____. Most performers may not object to you using their first name but I'm sure there are those who would like it to be their choice if you are more formal or informal. It's sort of like a job interview - when in doubt dress more formally.
it's not a big deal, come on, it's on a message board for Christ's sakes. At the SD, it's a different matter, but first names might be all right for the younger BW stars.
And one might consider it rude but I won't go as far as to postulate that the individual who calls performers by their first names is under the impression that he is BFF with said performer.
At least we don't have this problem with Orfeh!
Broadway Legend Joined: 9/25/08
^^^
LOL
OP, So your saying... Bailey Hanks, a 20 year old women, you would say "Ms. Banks."... sounds like Mary Poppins. Anyway, I really don't find it weird and from what I've noticed a lot of performers like when you know their (first) name.
"Generally, it's kinda rude to address someone face-to-face"
i think it depends on the circumstance...
Mr. Miranda, Ms. Blickenstaff, Mr. Groff, Mr. Howar would just be odd.
Broadway Legend Joined: 2/14/04
I'm from the South plus my dad was military so I grew up with Ms./Mr. and sir/ma'm. I guess it depends on the person to me, for example, you betcha it was "Mr. Sondheim" when I met him, "Mr. Kramer", Ms. Peters, Ms. LuPone, Mr. Grey, Mr. Rylance, etc. The younger people in their 30's I tended to never say their name. Though after a certain amount of conversation, it became "Raul", "Michael", "Donna Lynne" etc. I'm always weary about calling someone "Mr/Ms" cause I don't want them to feel old. And I think if I'd said "Mr. Cerveris" to Michael he woulda cringed.
Broadway Legend Joined: 1/3/05
OP, So your saying... Bailey Hanks, a 20 year old women, you would say "Ms. Banks."... sounds like Mary Poppins.
I'm pretty sure if you were to call her anything in that form it would be Ms. Hanks, not Ms. Banks and therefore not sound like Mary Poppins.
Actually, Brantley doesn't do that by choice - that's the New York Times stated house style. All persons in all articles and interviews are referred to with the appropriate honorific. You'll never see them write "Sondheim" or "LuPone". It'll always be "Mr. Sondheim" or "Ms. LuPone". I believe they're they only major paper left in the country that still utilizes that particular style.
The Wall Street Journal does it, too, I believe. They even use Messrs.
Broadway Legend Joined: 1/28/08
What if the performer was younger than you? I would feel silly calling Lindsay Northen, Miss Northen or Julie Reiber, Miss Reiber. Sounds like I am talking to a schoolteacher.
Unless they personally tell me to my face that I can address them (or even write about them in a first name basis)as "Michael" or "Patti," they will be "Mr. Ball" and "Ms. LuPone" or "Mr..." or their full name.
And I don't forsee any strong, deep personal friendship starting with any of them soon
I like to pretend they ARE my BFFs.
haha, jk. :)
For me, it depends on who they are. If they're older than me and someone I grew up watching they'd be Mr./Ms. I met Cindy Williams about this time last year and I called her Ms. Williams". But someone younger than me I typically call by their first name.
Most of the time that I am at the stage door people address the actors as "the person who played" whatever role they played. Or in some cases the name of their character. I always got the impression that actors like it when you take the time to learn their names as oppose to calling them by the names of their characters or "your the actress/actor who played..."
I don't call them Mr. or Ms. because I don't think that they are superior to me nor do I think I am superior to them.
Your question about addressing the children reminded me of the time I waited outside the Neil Simon to get Craig Bierko and Rebecca Luker's autographs after an evening run of "The Music Man". The first one out the stage door was young Jordan Puryear, who played Amaryllis. I had my Playbill and sharpie in hand so I asked her "Miss Puryear, may I have your autograph?" She was thrilled! (She said I was the first person who ever asked her for her autograph.) So maybe in the case of the kids, addressing them formally by their last names just might please them!
Broadway Star Joined: 5/19/03
It's pretentious. But just to be sure I asked Mandi, Patti, Audra, and Sutton about it and they all agreed with me.
When I use "Mr" or "Mrs" or "Ms" or whatever, I'm not saying "hello, I am pandering to you because I consider myself so terribly terribly inferior to you!". I'm showing respect. If I knew someone's last name and I were to address them by name, I would use their last name unless we had agreed between ourselves that first name would be fine. It's not for me to decide when it's appropriate to stop being politely formal when addressing someone; it's up to them to let me know if they're comfortable dropping the formality. Simple manners!
Videos