I know that Rose is considered one the greatest stage roles for women, but Christine has this ability to get deep into the psyches of strong, emotionally fragile women. When I picture Rose--and maybe this is just from my over-exposure with Bernadette's and Bette's performances--but I just visualize Rose as storming around the stage yelling and screaming, and Christine seems to be capable of so much more than that. Unless she could bring something completely new to the table, I'd rather see her take on the next great female stage role, whatever that may be. It seems that Rose is this character that is sort of a milestone for every actress to reach and get the opportunity to play--but we do have a future of musical theatre, and Christine is so versatile that I'd like her to create her own roles. Actresses like Bernadette and Patti -- who are around that mid-50s age range, like Christine, seem to be pigeonholed into reviving "classic" roles, when what I'd really love to see is some new roles written for women in their 50s, so that these enormously talented women can introduce us to great new roles. I mean, there are only so many times a new production of GYPSY can be launched (we're doing it every 12-15 years or so as of late) before one performance of Rose will begin to look an lot like the previous ones. Something that makes me excited about this Spring for instance, is how Donna Murphy, who is also in that same age range, is going to create a role in a new musical. I'd like for new roles to not only be written for the young girls, but for the great accomplished women that we already have.
"Winning a Tony this year is like winning Best Attendance in third grade: no one will care but the winner and their mom."
-Kad
"I have also met him in person, and I find him to be quite funny actually. Arrogant and often misinformed, but still funny."
-bjh2114 (on Michael Riedel)
Updated On: 12/4/06 at 10:08 AM