I haven't found bootlegs of Woman in White, Drowsy or Cry-Baby any more watchable than ones in any other theaters. Not that I've... you know... watched them.
Really, though, I'm kind of of the belief that bootlegs should only be for those who love and want to relive a show.
Back to the topic at hand - I want a cast recording so that bootlegs (at least of the audio variety) aren't necessary.
I'm all for recording most shows but I don't think this will happen. FOr one, the producers would have to pony up most of the funds and based on their paltry numbers and the number of comps they've handed out, which hasn't done much for their word of mouth, this turkey will be lucky if it plays long past opening (or even opens at all). Even those who sort of like it can't find much reason for a recording. Besides, that girl who played April in Company like she was on lithium shouldn't be allowed in any recording studio!
"Oh shut up about you cant judge a show of a bootleg *the show does not change in to some strange thing because its on a dvd*"
No, but it also isn't an accurate measure of a show in any way. I thought Cry-Baby was terrible. I still don't think you have the right to be posting an opinion when you've only seen a crappy DVD.
The real reason "Hairspray" worked so well was 1/ the audience loved Tracy from the first moment, 2/ the audience loved Edna from the first moment, 3/ the audience cared about how things were going to turn out for Tracy and Edna.
"Cry-Baby" gives you no one to care for, or root for. As corny as it seems, EVERY story needs someone for whom the audience can cheer. Here we have a limply drawn "good girl" and a "bad boy" so sketchy he makes Danny in "Grease" seem like Hamlet.
by kevvboy
**********
Yeah - a big colorful waste of money. Too bad, because it's got a great cast.
But really, it just seemed to be a HAIRSPRAY wanna be. Not to mention GREASE, FOREVER PLAID and ALL SHOOK UP.
by bruceb (who post here too)
***********
But as you note, they are separate shows, just as they were separate movies. In interviews, the director and actors from 'Cry-Baby' have made it clear that they're not trying to duplicate 'Hairspray' and are going for a different vibe. But when the reviews come out, I bet you'll be hard-pressed to find a critic who doesn't compare them.
'Cry-Baby' is in a no-win situation. If Jack O'Brien and Jerry Mitchell had been signed to 'Cry-Baby,' they'd be accused to re-creating 'Hairspray.' And even with different creative people, the show is still accused of that.
by Theaterguy
************
As it is, there's not one standout tune in the score, and not one new idea in the book. I agree that the source material is awfully thin; I remember mostly the lengths Waters went to, plotwise, to get Depp in his underwear for a stretch of the picture.
Anybody know how old Elizabeth Stanley is? She's playing 16 but I'm thinking she's really about 30. Just curious... not trashing 'cause I liked the show *ducks for cover*
< Patty Duke (the original Neely O'Hara) & me (March 8, 2010)
I'm obviously in the minority, but I would definitely love a recording. Yes the score has some pretty bad songs, but I liked more songs than I didn't. The cast was also amazing, vocally, both times I saw it and documenting that would be great.
a recording is a waste, considering how bland the score is.
but i wanted to chime in and agree that while Elizabeth Stanleys acting is pretty boring, her voice (at tonights performance at least) was out of this world.
it would be a shame if this wasnt recorded, since every other musical this season has been (and I do include the downloadable Glory Days tracks).....the score isnt the best of the season, but there certainly are several entertaining numbers....I hope we hear some word soon
He's a faker, and you've been taken in by his con. And in doing so, you are enabling him. He is doing more damage to aspergers than papa's words ever could. -Chane/Liverpool on me having asperger syndrome.