DREAMGIRLS - A Parody?- Page 2
DREAMGIRLS - A Parody?
Kringas
Broadway Legend Joined: 5/27/05
#25What ARE you talking about? !
Posted: 10/24/06 at 12:51pmShine, Deena, Shine.
DAME
Broadway Legend Joined: 4/15/04
#26What ARE you talking about? !
Posted: 10/24/06 at 12:52pmAnd I don't think Ms Ross is having a issue with anything. As a matter of fact.. I will bet you anything she will hit the talk show route shortly after the ( hopeful) success of the movie. She has a new mini tour to promote.
DAME
Broadway Legend Joined: 4/15/04
#27What ARE you talking about? !
Posted: 10/24/06 at 12:52pmAnd I don't think Ms Ross is having a issue with anything. As a matter of fact.. I will bet you anything she will hit the talk show route shortly after the ( hopeful) success of the movie. She has a new mini tour to promote.
#28What ARE you talking about? !
Posted: 10/24/06 at 12:58pm
You already said that.
MY TWO CENTS: I don't know very much about DREAMGIRLS, but I think it's very unoriginal, in my opinion. To me, it doesn't come off as a tribute. A parody more like, as someone posted earlier.
Vita, dulcedo, et spes nostra
Salve, Salve Regina
Ad te clamamus exsules filii Eva
Ad te suspiramus, gementes et flentes
O clemens O pia
Kringas
Broadway Legend Joined: 5/27/05
#29What ARE you talking about? !
Posted: 10/24/06 at 1:01pmWhat do you find it derivative of?
#30What ARE you talking about? !
Posted: 10/24/06 at 1:01pmIt isnt meant to be a tribute.
"In Oz, the verb is douchifizzation." PRS
Kringas
Broadway Legend Joined: 5/27/05
#31What ARE you talking about? !
Posted: 10/24/06 at 1:04pmIn what way do you find it parodic?
Unknown User
Joined: 12/31/69
#33What ARE you talking about? !
Posted: 10/24/06 at 1:13pm
Mama lied!
:)
"In Oz, the verb is douchifizzation." PRS
#34What ARE you talking about? !
Posted: 10/24/06 at 1:50pm
soooo.... you don't know anything about it, but you think it's unoriginal. you know what else is unoriginal- posters bashing something that they know nothing about.
#35What ARE you talking about? !
Posted: 10/24/06 at 2:08pmLet me clarify. I meant the faux album cover art (used in the film) was unoriginal, not the show itself. All I'm saying is, they could've created their own for the movie, not copy an existing one.
Vita, dulcedo, et spes nostra
Salve, Salve Regina
Ad te clamamus exsules filii Eva
Ad te suspiramus, gementes et flentes
O clemens O pia
#36What ARE you talking about? !
Posted: 10/24/06 at 2:15pm
my bad, manager. I was being over-protective of the Glory that is Dreamgirls. no offence intended. 
#37What ARE you talking about? !
Posted: 10/24/06 at 2:19pm
No offense taken.
I've not been exposed to this musical yet, so I'm really looking forward to this film. I guess you could say I'm a DREAMGIRLS virgin.
One problem: Should I make myself familiar with the music before I watch the movie, or should I wait and be surprised? (Hopefully, pleasantly surprised.)
Vita, dulcedo, et spes nostra
Salve, Salve Regina
Ad te clamamus exsules filii Eva
Ad te suspiramus, gementes et flentes
O clemens O pia
#38What ARE you talking about? !
Posted: 10/24/06 at 2:23pmyou can wait. the music is so accessible that you won't have a problem not knowing what is going on. also, since there will be modern day riffs which, I'm sure will make some of the die-hards upset, I would wait and make the movie you first Dreamgirls experience.
#39What ARE you talking about? !
Posted: 10/24/06 at 2:43pm
...and then run and buy the original cast album and the 2001 Concert!
RUN!
"In Oz, the verb is douchifizzation." PRS
BrodyFosse123
Broadway Legend Joined: 2/27/06
#40What ARE you talking about? !
Posted: 10/24/06 at 2:44pm
There are no 'modern day' riffs in any of the singing. The songs are performed in their original form. Even Beyonce' had to 'learn' to sing in that bland Deena style. She also said she had to learn to emulate those 60's female vocalist's mannerisms, from just simple walking to their 'almost no movement' performing stle. Completely different from HER style of performing, both in singing and dancing.
Everyone in the film went thru a so-called DREAMGIRLS boot camp, whereas they learned the performing style of that period (early 60's thru the mid-1970's). Alot of research was put into the film, so it's reflected in every aspect.
Updated On: 10/24/06 at 02:44 PM
#41What ARE you talking about? !
Posted: 10/24/06 at 2:46pmummmm... I still think I heard a few "Beyonceisms" in the preview.
Unknown User
Joined: 12/31/69
BrodyFosse123
Broadway Legend Joined: 2/27/06
#43What ARE you talking about? !
Posted: 10/24/06 at 2:54pm
Only in the "Listen" song (which takes place in the mid-1970's right before the end of the film) is she heard 'riffing'. There is good reason for it as it's the first-time Deena is heard singing in her own voice/style and not in the 'pop' Deena-style Curtis has been forcing her to use. The song has several meanings to it.
Updated On: 10/24/06 at 02:54 PM
#44What ARE you talking about? !
Posted: 10/24/06 at 2:56pm
You can hear those riffs in every song she sings in the film.
The one i didnt understand was in "It's All Over" when singing the line "It was you alway thinking of youuuuu always thinking of youuuu"
BrodyFosse123
Broadway Legend Joined: 2/27/06
#45What ARE you talking about? !
Posted: 10/24/06 at 3:00pm
I agree with those 'riffs' in "It's All Over", but Loretta Devine was all riffs with her Lorrell in the original, as was Jennifer Holliday with her Effie.
Soulful riffs are a norm for this type of musical, even in a Broadway musical, so DREAMGIRLS, both the original Broadway production and the film are loaded with them.
#46What ARE you talking about? !
Posted: 10/24/06 at 10:11pm
First of all, who the f*ck cares if she "riffs?"
It wasn't invented in 1999. It goes back a LONG way. Remember Aretha? And umpteen million disco ladies. And I hope Beyonce takes full advantage of it on her pop songs in the movie. Why the hell not?
Deena is NOT an "innocent" in the film. And thank GOD, because it would be pretty BORING if she was. Beyonce has said that she approached it with a bit of the devil in her. Deena seizes the opportunities presented to her... including Curtis... and including the lead spot in the group.
This is different than the stage show, but certainly a viable (and probably better dramatically) interpretation of Deena's road to success.
EDIT: Oh, and some of the album art that is circulating around on the Internet and on the boards IS "fan art." It's not all from the film. So take a look around first, and then make your call. You obviously haven't seen all the stuff being posted. And some of it is pretty CRAPPY, by the way.
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
BrodyFosse123
Broadway Legend Joined: 2/27/06
#47What ARE you talking about? !
Posted: 10/24/06 at 11:55pm
Thanks for the heads-up, best12bars...but I'll leave the honors to you regarding checking-out the 'fan art' crap that's floating around on the internet. I'll just keep myself simple and stay with the material that Dreamworks and Paramount Pictures is spoon feeding me instead of wasting my time scouring the internet for pointless 'crap'. Seems you've had the time to do so, so no need for me to try to emulate your masterful work. I wouldn't fathom that idea one second.
Thanks again...and as always -- enjoy the pies. Especially the blueberry ones.
PS: back to watching the screener DVD of the movie.
BrodyFosse123
Broadway Legend Joined: 2/27/06
Unknown User
Joined: 12/31/69
#49...
Posted: 10/25/06 at 5:54am
Hey all,
Actually Deena sings in her "own" voice in "It's All Over" too, not just "Listen." So going by that argument, she is allowed to riff on "you-u-u-u."
But actually I noticed something interesting, on the website now when it plays a clip of the title song, Beyonce is NOT riffing at all basically, compared to her very modern vocals on the Tony Awards commercial. It seems clear that several versions of songs were recorded here...maybe for the commerical they showed something that is more exciting to today's audience, but in the movie they will first sing the song sans riffing...?
Videos