The point that you seem to be avoiding is that the ticket sales were not high enought to support this show's operating costs. This wasn't an enormous production along the lines of Lion king Phantom, saigon etc. This show was by no means small, but It didn't have a huge ensemble, big stars or an enormous set. It just never found an audience and that is why it lost money. These costs didn't just spring up out of nowhere. The show's budget is set and agreed upon based on a projected number of ticket sales. When tickets don't sell the profit margin lowers and that is when things like this happen.
As for greed on the part of the producers-I think that is far too simplistic of a premise.It is a combination of many factors. And I feel like this is going to turn into a "chicken or the egg debate. Which came first Higher ticket prices or higher salaries because of the higher ticket prices?
If anything Broadway attendance has gone up, so the people have shown that they are willing to pay these higher prices. Equity minimum salaries are not exorbidant at all in comparison to other top level jobs. 75 grand a year (If a show runs that long) is not making anyone rich in Manahattan. Remember thes aren't entry level positions.
Touring adds in the cost of per diem rates which are set by the union, which some say are too high. But ask any executive with any company who pays for his travel and living expenses when he is on a business trip. Why should it be any different for actors?
Other than that, did you enjoy the play Mrs Lincoln?
Updated On: 1/31/07 at 02:36 PM
