Broadway Legend Joined: 2/15/05
Didn't know if anyone posted this, I searched, but alas, I didn't find aything. They're doing a new "edgier" version of RENT in London. Link below.
Article
Updated On: 5/8/07 at 05:53 PM
Broadway Legend Joined: 10/29/04
It'll be interesting to see what an "edgier" version actually will be. Maybe they'll have Mimi die at the end, like one previous international production did.
You know, I actually think it would be fascinating to see Rent mounted with a different physical staging. I'm not sure what they could mean by "edgier" other than that, though.
I hate the word "edgy."
Up there with "random."
Can anyone actually locate where on WhatsOnStage.com it claims there'll be a new 'RENT'? It's not like we haven't had it rumoured for months, but I'd still like to actually read the original article, only I can't find it.
Trafalgar Studios = definitely ace venue though. :3
(RentBoy86 - we often talk about London productions on the West End message board on this very site. We've definitely discussed this production a few times! )
Broadway Legend Joined: 2/15/05
I hate when old white men say they want to make something "edgier." They better not to try to update the slang and stuff. I think it's like A Chorus Line, where it's a period piece, so keep it in the period. Maybe "Edgier" by adding more actual live rock music instead of just synths. I think the show would work better on a whole if they cast people that were actually the age, or close to the age of the actual characters. If you don't then you just have grown adults bitching about not paying the Rent.
I agree, RentBoy.
Does the slang need updating, though? Nothing in the show is so old that we don't get it or that it sounds funny. We're not talking about a show that was written in the 70s.
I'm curious to hear more about this.
Trafalgar Studios is a great place for the show!
I recall when they were first talking about re doing this show that they were going to change the location to London as oppose to NYC. A couple of people that i talked to agredthat it would kill the show if they changedthe location. There was someone on the west end forum who said that would totaly kill the show if they changed locations. I also recall reading not that long ago the closing notice form the Shaftsbury production. It gave off the impression that the show was too "new York" for west end.
But, I don't think that they are going to change the story line. Such as Mimi dying at the end ect.
Broadway Legend Joined: 12/31/69
As a huge Kylie fan, it's well known that the extremely talented and extremely annoying Willie Baker has both done wonders for her career and created a few probs. He has staged and directed her last 3 tours though with great results...
But then again a tour director doesn't equal a theatre director no matter how theatrical they are (just look at the awful directing done for Closer to Heaven by the Pet Shop Boys great experimental tour director)
this is really interesting... do you think that they will show more drug use? that's the first thing that popped into my head...
Broadway Legend Joined: 2/18/07
Edgy is such broad term, so who knows what they are planning, but I'd love to know more about this. I agree that the slang isn't really dated yet. I think audiences understand that its a period piece, albeit a recent one. I mean people didnt have a prb with the slang in Company.
Interesting idea about the drug use - they might, instead of just showing the bag of drugs, show them actually using.
I just don't see showing them doing the drugs making it "edgier". You see that on half of the kids shows. Ok, maybe that is an exaggeration but it has become so mainstream not edgy.
I hate the term "edgier". I really don't see how this could be edgier or why they would want to make it edgier in the first place.
Yeah, but Company is to the point that if you stage it to be contemporary without changing the script, it has anachronisms. "On the wagon," the reference to the Seagram's Building, "when are we going to make it?" etc. -- just to name a few. They're not bothersome, but they're there.
Anyway, back on topic, I think this could be fantastic, or it could be a disaster. There's so much that could be done to the show to make it really dirty, but I think with this kind of thing, there's a way to make it theatrically beauitful, but it's also very easy to go overboard.
I mean people didnt have a prb with the slang in Company.
Yes, because Company is known for its edgy slang.
I also think it would be interesting to see a different direction of Rent. Not necessarily "edgier" or "more street" or whatever, just a different perspective on the material.
It sounds cool. An intimate location would be awesome.
skittles - I agree. A different take on it would be fine, but don't make it "edgier" just to score points with teens or something, and that is what it sounds like to me at the moment.
I mean they could go all out like the holland production did. That production had whatever Mark was filming show up on screens around the stage and they symbolized Roger's refusal to leave home by having him sit under a giant bed.
But, there have been so many small things done over the years to different productions of the show. For instense, I recall reading about one international production that acted out the events that were shown in the film at the start of the finale.
http://www.compulsivebowlers.org/boards/viewtopic.php?t=5208&highlight=
While I guess in a way it's dated in terms of social issues, like AIDS medication has improved and the East Village has been gentrified, but changing the show to reflect those would require extensive altering of the story. Other than giving Benny a Blackberry and updating some of the costumes, there's nothing in the show on surface level that's so drastically different now than it was when the show opened.
RENT is sacred. I hope they don't change it too much. It always creeps me out to hear it sung in an english accent anyway...
i really wonder what they are going to do to the book... i'm all for changes and adaptations, but moving it to London just really does not make sense...
Broadway Legend Joined: 2/18/07
"changing the show to reflect those would require extensive altering of the story"
Exactly. You can only update a musical thats set in the late 80s/early 90s in NY so much without losing credibility for the story, too.
I mean if it looked too contemporary, it wouldnt be believable that this group of young people who didnt have that much money could live in a loft downtown. If they were going to make those kinds of changes, it would be much more than just making it edgier.
Who knows, but I'm looking forward to seeing what they actually do.
gymnastdzb2, please don't post again until you grow up, get some perspective and stop making Rent fans look like complete idiots. Thanks.
Videos