So, this may be a really stupid question, but I'm going to ask it anyway. I went and saw Mamma Mia (touring company) in Kansas City last night. As I was going through the program, and reading the bios, I saw that 16 actors had put in their bios "proud member of AEA" or something to that effect. Some had it in all caps, and most had it followed with an exclamation mark. Is there something going on that would make Equity Actors feel the need to "boost it up?" I'm not saying by any stretch that I think they shouldn't put it in their bios. It's just that when 16 put it in, one starts to wonder. If that's a dumb question, my apologies...
Broadway Legend Joined: 9/29/04
Actors' Equity Association has been stressing "Equity Pride" to its members lately. They are strongly encouraging their members to give some sort of "shoutout" (if you will) to AEA in their bios, whether they are saying how long they've been a member, or that they are proud to be a member. So that is why you're seeing an influx of AEA mentions in actors' bios.
Not a dumb question at all!
"IF IT'S NOT EQUITY, IT'S NOT BROADWAY!"
Updated On: 2/14/05 at 05:25 PM
Thanks a bunch! That really helps. I was thinking there was gonna be another strike, and I was going to fall over!
Thanks again!
Equity Baby! Damn, for a moment I just felt like Anna Nicole Smith!!
In your case I would say ecstatic!
Broadway Legend Joined: 1/3/05
I noticed this too. Heck, if I were equity I would shout it to the world!
Featured Actor Joined: 5/26/04
whats equity do?
Broadway Legend Joined: 9/29/04
Actors' Equity Association is the American union for professional actors and stage managers.
They act like any other union, guaranteeing health benefits, wages, etc.
Any Broadway or off-Broadway actor is a member of AEA (with a VERY rare few exceptions).
For more information, visit http://www.actorsequity.org
Updated On: 2/14/05 at 08:22 PM
im not equity (yet!) only sag!! :)
i want a REALLY cool project to give me my equity card!!!
"I think it was the Korean tour or something. They were all frickin' asian!" -Zoran912
Broadway Legend Joined: 9/29/04
For those who don't know:
SAG is the Screen Actors' Guild. They are the equivalent of Actors' Equity Association, except SAG is for film and television actors, as the name suggests.
Chorus Member Joined: 1/23/05
a union card doesnt make you a great performer. Ive seen some pretty crappy auditions from union actors, and amazing things from non-union. Its just a card. Remember the actor who joins Equity was non-equity yesterday! Same perfoemer however. Union actor doesnt always mean working actor either! SO many young actors rush into the unions without a resume/experience to back them up. Then they are screwed, because they cant do anything. Cant get cast in union shows, and cant work non-union to gain experience. Although, the catch-22, you shouldnt seriously do the "New York" thing until you ARE in the unions. Advice: work regionally/stock/non equity tours/ etc until you are ready. Youll know that when you're working consistently, your probably ready to enter the next level. Good luck!
As a member of Equity, I have to say I am NOT a proud member.
Because as someone said earlier, they are supposed to guarantee things like Health Benefits and Wages...however...often time those wages are as low as $245 a week. And with the amount of weeks you need to "guarantee" health benefits, it's virtually impossible to acquire them, unless you are in a successful Broadway show (look out cast of GV).
Equity, IMHO, is past it's prime and is no longer serving it's membership well.
What this post will be met with is cries of "Well, if you want change, YOU should run for office." Well to be quite frank-A)With the day jobs I am required to handle, I don't have extra time, in addition to an auditioning schedule, to pursue Equity office. and B) I'm not really interested in running for office in an organization which basically serves little-to-no purpose and continually refuses to stand up for things that matter with their membership.
Flame away...
Much of the 'proudness factor' has been inspired by the non-equity tour debate. A lot of the national touring companies are saving money by employing non-union actors, and AEA nor its members are pleased with that decision.
A lot of people feel that these tours should remain under equity contracts, because the shows aren't as good as when they employed equity actors (quality of performers). AEA has asked its members to wear their membership proudly as sort of a "stamp of quality" if you will.
not to once again drudge up this debate :) but the non-tour issue also has to do with why Equity was started 90+ years ago--producers shouldn't take advantage of actors and stage managers. The actors and stage managers on tour should have a minimum of protections---from wage to housing to scheduling to health. They are not getting the same protections that they would if they were Equity.
But again one can argue that even the Equity actors in Equity productions that are currently touring are not getting real protection from the union. Equity has proven themself as somewhat useless on repeated occassions. EVERY other theatrical union offers far better protection than Equity does for it's membership.
camthom--name the things that are lacking on Equity National Tours.
Yes, if you get a job at a small Equity theatre, you can get less than $300 a week. But if you can't afford that--don't take that gig. If you can sublet your NYC apt and the theatre is paying for your housing, it's a viable option for some actors. But a lot of the smaller houses are best for local Equity actors who don't need to live off of their salary.
Interesting to note that actors Off-Broadway get around $300 a week. I know they do at the Atlantic Theater Company.
I'm not saying Equity is perfect--and, no, it's not as strong as SAG, but you are certainly taking an extremist view of it that I don't think holds fair.
agreed JRB - not perfect, smaller base with less money to work with than SAG - but, I believe, always trying to improve.
Proud member here too!
Broadway Legend Joined: 9/29/04
I would like to echo the comment made by jasonvanemburgh. Being Equity does not equal being a good performer.
DISCLAIMER!! I am NOT trashing anyone this board!
But I do know of people who have received Equity cards from doing something, like, performing on a cruise ship... where you don't exactly have to be the next Broadway star to be cast in. Some Equity members actually lack talent.
Maybe once you are qualified to join Equity, they should make you audition to see if you are talented enough! No, that would be just cruel. And it could diminish Equity's income considerably.
Proud Equity member here!
Broadway Star Joined: 2/15/05
haha...i just want to be Equity to get my foot in the door. do i need it?
matthius~ there are some GREAT non equity opportunities, and not everything GREAT is equity. Being in SAG, I'm now finding that some projects I'd like to be involved in are non-equity. The grass is always greener on the other side...
"I think it was the Korean tour or something. They were all frickin' asian!" -Zoran912
Broadway Star Joined: 2/15/05
yeah..i mean i'm about to go to the SETC auditions...and some of the companies that will be there will be Equity companies...I'm so confused about it all. And half of me just doesn't care about all that...i just want to perform. THATS ALL. UGH...i HATE politics.
Videos