THE CURIOUS INCIDENT OF THE DOG IN THE NIGHT-TIME is not to be missed. See it. No need to continue the discussion. I'm actually perplexed as to why, if you haven't seen it yet, you would even consider anything else. And I do not ask that as a criticism of your judgement, but, rather, has the show not grown a reputation outside of New York? I assumed out-of-towners/tourists are aware of the show and it's excellence. I had thought it was on the same level of interest as WAR HORSE. Yet, you and relatives of mine ask if it truly is worth seeing.
There must be some sort of disconnect in its marketing for someone to even ask if they should see it. I marvel at this because everyone in New York knows of its greatness. We've all seen it and raved about it and awarded it with practically all the trophies possible. How is it that this show is not at the top of everyone's list, if you haven't seen it?
"The Spectacle has, indeed, an emotional attraction of its own, but, of all the parts, it is the least artistic, and connected least with the art of poetry. For the power of Tragedy, we may be sure, is felt even apart from representation and actors. Besides, the production of spectacular effects depends more on the art of the stage machinist than on that of the poet."
--Aristotle