Your profile says you are a journalist. Obviously the standards of traditional journalism do not apply here, but if you want to make an accusation, you ought to be prepared to back it up. Your initial post said clearly that Nathan Lane's involvement in Addams Family has lead you to anticipate that the opening might be postponed. When challenged you offered completely unrelated examples of him missing shows due to injury and deciding he did not want to be in a film. When challenged again, you offered this underhanded crack:
He has had a very distinguished theatrical career, and I give him his props.
(I believe he also missed some performances of The Odd Couple as well... laryngitis?? Don't recall... and it doesn't really matter does it??)
If it doesn't really matter, why say it? Let me play journalism teacher a moment and show you how one would REALLY "Make a case" in an expose.
"I think Walnut started this thread to stir up some Poop about Nathan Lane. She claimed to be afraid to buy opening night tickets to the Addams Family because Nathan Lane's involvement in the show made her worry that the opening would be postponed. But, of course, Nathan Lane has never been responsible for a show not opening on time. She then tried to back up her accusation by saying that Lane "sometimes has problems," citing some injuries and never missing a chance to take a swipe at the stage star. On top of this, no opening night for this show has been scheduled, no tickets have gone on sale and indeed, no theater has been chosen- making it rather fishy that Walnut is already worried that the date would be changed due to Lane's shenanigans. Walnut obviously has a vendetta against Lane or this show and is still conducting an unfounded whisper campaign as I type."
See not so hard. State your thesis, offer corroborating evidence, then re-state your thesis. As my journalism teacher would say: "Tell 'em what you're gonna tell 'em, then tell 'em, then tell 'em what you told 'em."
Updated On: 5/29/09 at 05:56 PM