Oh, and art,
Let me save you from re-posting the same thing over and over again...
"If the director has downplayed the gay male affection or specifically eliminated any of the male-male kisses then he should be made to answer, simple as that. Directorial flourish is one thing, censorship based on homophobia is another. I won't tolerate it and neither should anyone who has the remotest interest in RENT.
And what's the point of waiting until the movie is out? If the damage is done, the damage is done."
Oh, and art,
Let me save you from re-posting the same thing over and over again...
"If the director has downplayed the gay male affection or specifically eliminated any of the male-male kisses then he should be made to answer, simple as that. Directorial flourish is one thing, censorship based on homophobia is another. I won't tolerate it and neither should anyone who has the remotest interest in RENT.
And what's the point of waiting until the movie is out? If the damage is done, the damage is done."
Oh, and art,
Let me save you from re-posting the same thing over and over again...
"If the director has downplayed the gay male affection or specifically eliminated any of the male-male kisses then he should be made to answer, simple as that. Directorial flourish is one thing, censorship based on homophobia is another. I won't tolerate it and neither should anyone who has the remotest interest in RENT.
And what's the point of waiting until the movie is out? If the damage is done, the damage is done."
Oh, and art,
Let me save you from re-posting the same thing over and over again...
"If the director has downplayed the gay male affection or specifically eliminated any of the male-male kisses then he should be made to answer, simple as that. Directorial flourish is one thing, censorship based on homophobia is another. I won't tolerate it and neither should anyone who has the remotest interest in RENT.
And what's the point of waiting until the movie is out? If the damage is done, the damage is done."
Oh, and art,
Let me save you from re-posting the same thing over and over again...
"If the director has downplayed the gay male affection or specifically eliminated any of the male-male kisses then he should be made to answer, simple as that. Directorial flourish is one thing, censorship based on homophobia is another. I won't tolerate it and neither should anyone who has the remotest interest in RENT.
And what's the point of waiting until the movie is out? If the damage is done, the damage is done."
Oh, and art,
Let me save you from re-posting the same thing over and over again...
"If the director has downplayed the gay male affection or specifically eliminated any of the male-male kisses then he should be made to answer, simple as that. Directorial flourish is one thing, censorship based on homophobia is another. I won't tolerate it and neither should anyone who has the remotest interest in RENT.
And what's the point of waiting until the movie is out? If the damage is done, the damage is done."
Oh, and art,
Let me save you from re-posting the same thing over and over again...
"If the director has downplayed the gay male affection or specifically eliminated any of the male-male kisses then he should be made to answer, simple as that. Directorial flourish is one thing, censorship based on homophobia is another. I won't tolerate it and neither should anyone who has the remotest interest in RENT.
And what's the point of waiting until the movie is out? If the damage is done, the damage is done."
Oh, and art,
Let me save you from re-posting the same thing over and over again...
"If the director has downplayed the gay male affection or specifically eliminated any of the male-male kisses then he should be made to answer, simple as that. Directorial flourish is one thing, censorship based on homophobia is another. I won't tolerate it and neither should anyone who has the remotest interest in RENT.
And what's the point of waiting until the movie is out? If the damage is done, the damage is done."
Oh, and art,
Let me save you from re-posting the same thing over and over again...
"If the director has downplayed the gay male affection or specifically eliminated any of the male-male kisses then he should be made to answer, simple as that. Directorial flourish is one thing, censorship based on homophobia is another. I won't tolerate it and neither should anyone who has the remotest interest in RENT.
And what's the point of waiting until the movie is out? If the damage is done, the damage is done."
Oh, and art,
Let me save you from re-posting the same thing over and over again...
"If the director has downplayed the gay male affection or specifically eliminated any of the male-male kisses then he should be made to answer, simple as that. Directorial flourish is one thing, censorship based on homophobia is another. I won't tolerate it and neither should anyone who has the remotest interest in RENT.
And what's the point of waiting until the movie is out? If the damage is done, the damage is done."
Oh, and art,
Let me save you from re-posting the same thing over and over again...
"If the director has downplayed the gay male affection or specifically eliminated any of the male-male kisses then he should be made to answer, simple as that. Directorial flourish is one thing, censorship based on homophobia is another. I won't tolerate it and neither should anyone who has the remotest interest in RENT.
And what's the point of waiting until the movie is out? If the damage is done, the damage is done."
Oh, and art,
Let me save you from re-posting the same thing over and over again...
"If the director has downplayed the gay male affection or specifically eliminated any of the male-male kisses then he should be made to answer, simple as that. Directorial flourish is one thing, censorship based on homophobia is another. I won't tolerate it and neither should anyone who has the remotest interest in RENT.
And what's the point of waiting until the movie is out? If the damage is done, the damage is done."
Oh, and art,
Let me save you from re-posting the same thing over and over again...
"If the director has downplayed the gay male affection or specifically eliminated any of the male-male kisses then he should be made to answer, simple as that. Directorial flourish is one thing, censorship based on homophobia is another. I won't tolerate it and neither should anyone who has the remotest interest in RENT.
And what's the point of waiting until the movie is out? If the damage is done, the damage is done."
Oh, and art,
Let me save you from re-posting the same thing over and over again...
"If the director has downplayed the gay male affection or specifically eliminated any of the male-male kisses then he should be made to answer, simple as that. Directorial flourish is one thing, censorship based on homophobia is another. I won't tolerate it and neither should anyone who has the remotest interest in RENT.
And what's the point of waiting until the movie is out? If the damage is done, the damage is done."
Oh, and art,
Let me save you from re-posting the same thing over and over again...
"If the director has downplayed the gay male affection or specifically eliminated any of the male-male kisses then he should be made to answer, simple as that. Directorial flourish is one thing, censorship based on homophobia is another. I won't tolerate it and neither should anyone who has the remotest interest in RENT.
And what's the point of waiting until the movie is out? If the damage is done, the damage is done."
Oh, and art,
Let me save you from re-posting the same thing over and over again...
"If the director has downplayed the gay male affection or specifically eliminated any of the male-male kisses then he should be made to answer, simple as that. Directorial flourish is one thing, censorship based on homophobia is another. I won't tolerate it and neither should anyone who has the remotest interest in RENT.
And what's the point of waiting until the movie is out? If the damage is done, the damage is done."
Oh, and art,
Let me save you from re-posting the same thing over and over again...
"If the director has downplayed the gay male affection or specifically eliminated any of the male-male kisses then he should be made to answer, simple as that. Directorial flourish is one thing, censorship based on homophobia is another. I won't tolerate it and neither should anyone who has the remotest interest in RENT.
And what's the point of waiting until the movie is out? If the damage is done, the damage is done."
Oh, and art,
Let me save you from re-posting the same thing over and over again...
"If the director has downplayed the gay male affection or specifically eliminated any of the male-male kisses then he should be made to answer, simple as that. Directorial flourish is one thing, censorship based on homophobia is another. I won't tolerate it and neither should anyone who has the remotest interest in RENT.
And what's the point of waiting until the movie is out? If the damage is done, the damage is done."
Oh, and art,
Let me save you from re-posting the same thing over and over again...
"If the director has downplayed the gay male affection or specifically eliminated any of the male-male kisses then he should be made to answer, simple as that. Directorial flourish is one thing, censorship based on homophobia is another. I won't tolerate it and neither should anyone who has the remotest interest in RENT.
And what's the point of waiting until the movie is out? If the damage is done, the damage is done."
Oh, and art,
Let me save you from re-posting the same thing over and over again...
"If the director has downplayed the gay male affection or specifically eliminated any of the male-male kisses then he should be made to answer, simple as that. Directorial flourish is one thing, censorship based on homophobia is another. I won't tolerate it and neither should anyone who has the remotest interest in RENT.
And what's the point of waiting until the movie is out? If the damage is done, the damage is done."
Oh, and art,
Let me save you from re-posting the same thing over and over again...
"If the director has downplayed the gay male affection or specifically eliminated any of the male-male kisses then he should be made to answer, simple as that. Directorial flourish is one thing, censorship based on homophobia is another. I won't tolerate it and neither should anyone who has the remotest interest in RENT.
And what's the point of waiting until the movie is out? If the damage is done, the damage is done."
Oh, and art,
Let me save you from re-posting the same thing over and over again...
"If the director has downplayed the gay male affection or specifically eliminated any of the male-male kisses then he should be made to answer, simple as that. Directorial flourish is one thing, censorship based on homophobia is another. I won't tolerate it and neither should anyone who has the remotest interest in RENT.
And what's the point of waiting until the movie is out? If the damage is done, the damage is done."
Oh, and art,
Let me save you from re-posting the same thing over and over again...
"If the director has downplayed the gay male affection or specifically eliminated any of the male-male kisses then he should be made to answer, simple as that. Directorial flourish is one thing, censorship based on homophobia is another. I won't tolerate it and neither should anyone who has the remotest interest in RENT.
And what's the point of waiting until the movie is out? If the damage is done, the damage is done."
Oh, and art,
Let me save you from re-posting the same thing over and over again...
"If the director has downplayed the gay male affection or specifically eliminated any of the male-male kisses then he should be made to answer, simple as that. Directorial flourish is one thing, censorship based on homophobia is another. I won't tolerate it and neither should anyone who has the remotest interest in RENT.
And what's the point of waiting until the movie is out? If the damage is done, the damage is done."
Oh, and art,
Let me save you from re-posting the same thing over and over again...
"If the director has downplayed the gay male affection or specifically eliminated any of the male-male kisses then he should be made to answer, simple as that. Directorial flourish is one thing, censorship based on homophobia is another. I won't tolerate it and neither should anyone who has the remotest interest in RENT.
And what's the point of waiting until the movie is out? If the damage is done, the damage is done."
Videos