#26
Posted: 4/26/07 at 1:48pm
If the rumor that ALW wants to return to the Hal Prince version of Evita is true, that's pretty sad. I've enjoyed the re-incarnations of the Prince staging but was excited that a new - rethought production (with some score, orchestration changes/alterations) was being done.
I realize ALW doesnt want his productions to fail or not be commercially successful, but the problem's basically because he set the bar so high... Into the Woods opened the same time as Phantom - Into the woods closed, was revived and closed on broadway - while Phantom still runs with attendance figures other shows would kill for.
That's not a dig at Into the Woods - I like that show - it just means that just because somethings not a money juggernaut doesn't mean it's poor or a failure.
The new Evita got a lot of great reviews from London critics who praised not just Rogers, but the new production.
I think it's just that with a steady stream of kid or family friendly stuff or musicalizations of popular stuff (Legally Blonde, Young Frankenstein...) it's a harder sell.
I loved The Woman in White - but for American audiences it's not a popular novel (never heard of it myself) and really required the theatregoer to pay close attention to the story, music and lyrics. The vast numbers of people going to the theatre today aren't prepared to do that.
And to bring this LONG disertation full circle - I think thats why Evita isn't as huge a success in London - not because of Rogers, or the new production - but that it's a story many who go to the theatre these days aren't familiar with - it requires paying attention to the story, music and lyrics. In short, I doubt the Hal Prince version would be much more successful these days than the new production
Jim
I realize ALW doesnt want his productions to fail or not be commercially successful, but the problem's basically because he set the bar so high... Into the Woods opened the same time as Phantom - Into the woods closed, was revived and closed on broadway - while Phantom still runs with attendance figures other shows would kill for.
That's not a dig at Into the Woods - I like that show - it just means that just because somethings not a money juggernaut doesn't mean it's poor or a failure.
The new Evita got a lot of great reviews from London critics who praised not just Rogers, but the new production.
I think it's just that with a steady stream of kid or family friendly stuff or musicalizations of popular stuff (Legally Blonde, Young Frankenstein...) it's a harder sell.
I loved The Woman in White - but for American audiences it's not a popular novel (never heard of it myself) and really required the theatregoer to pay close attention to the story, music and lyrics. The vast numbers of people going to the theatre today aren't prepared to do that.
And to bring this LONG disertation full circle - I think thats why Evita isn't as huge a success in London - not because of Rogers, or the new production - but that it's a story many who go to the theatre these days aren't familiar with - it requires paying attention to the story, music and lyrics. In short, I doubt the Hal Prince version would be much more successful these days than the new production
Jim