Mister Matt said: "It’s one of my favorite musicals, but it lost to Spamalot at the Tonys because some people are really uncomfortable with the subject matter.
Really? That's why the majority of voters selectedSpamalot for Best Musical? Because an unknown percentage of themwere "uncomfortable" and simply tipped the scale in Spamalot's favor? You make it sound like the voters have never experienced dramatic musicals before in their nearly century-long existence in musical theatre history. Somehow, it sounds like a convenient, and rather lofty, excuse to try and justify a decision you don't particularly like. Sometimes if has nothing to do with their comfort level on the subject matter. In fact, it's much more likely that the majority of themenjoyed Spamalot more than Piazza and it's really that simple."
Mister Matt, why the hostility? And how would you presume to know my thought process? A lot of people intensely dislike Piazza for various reasons - they hate the score, they think the whole thing is pretentious, and yes, the subject matter has a certain “ick” factor for some people. This is what I have gathered from both the Broadway production and the long-running Chicago production that I was in.
Spamalot is fine. It’s a harmless, silly, “lovingly ripped-off” stage version of the movie. Although I strongly believe Piazza should have won that year, I understand why it didn’t, and I got over it like a decade ago. Speaking of a decade ago, you were much nicer then.