Is it time for Sutton to move on? What would we like to see her in next?

#1

Is it time for Sutton to move on? What would we like to see her in next?

Posted: 7/14/03 at 4:19pm

Does anyone think it's time for Sutton to move on from Millie. NOT THAT SHE'S BAD or anything, just her time to bow out and try something new. If so, what other roles do you think she should tackle?

She's fairly versatile, I've seen her as Sandy in Grease and Eponine. She was also Star to Be in Annie, and ensemble for Pimpernel. What other roles should she move into..?

#2

re: Is it time for Sutton to move on? What would we like to see her in next?

Posted: 7/14/03 at 4:23pm

i would like to see her in funny girl, but it might be to close to millie in some ways??

maybe cassie in a chorus line when she gets a little older

sukie in the witches of eastwick

i think a composer needs to right her a musical!!!

#3

re: re: Is it time for Sutton to move on? What would we like to see her in next?

Posted: 7/14/03 at 4:31pm

Cassie is definitely a good choice, VERY good choice!

#4

re: re: re: Is it time for Sutton to move on? What would we like to see her in next?

Posted: 7/14/03 at 4:50pm

i am also suprised that sutton is still in millie. i wonder has many offers come her way since she was the talk of town and won the tony and is a triple threat?? you would think that she would have started somthing new. does anyone know if she has many offers for shows or if she working on somthing new?? thanks :)

#5

re: re: re: re: Is it time for Sutton to move on? What would we like to see her in next?

Posted: 7/14/03 at 4:54pm

how bout Velma or Roxie in Chicago, she would be an amazing asset as a true triple!!

#6

re: re: re: re: re: Is it time for Sutton to move on? What would we like to see her in next?

Posted: 7/14/03 at 4:56pm

She'd be a good Roxie. A little young.

#7

re: re: re: re: re: re: Is it time for Sutton to move on? What would we like to see her in next?

Posted: 7/14/03 at 4:59pm

Yah but Ruthie Henshall played Roxie when she was 30, not that young, ok then Velma, lol

Updated On: 7/14/03 at 04:59 PM

#8

re: re: re: re: re: re: Is it time for Sutton to move on? What would we like to see her in next?

Posted: 7/14/03 at 4:59pm

maybe sally bowls

#9

re: re: re: re: re: re: re: Is it time for Sutton to move on? What would we like to see her in next?

Posted: 7/14/03 at 5:02pm

Sally sounds great, but do you think Sutton's too tall?

I was thinking maybe Audrey, but then they'd hafta can both Hunter and Kerry

But think about it, Tall thin belty Sutton as Audrey, taller then Seymour...the way it should be...

#10

Is it time for Sutton to move on? What would we like to see her in next?

Posted: 7/14/03 at 5:35pm

Huh? Cabaret? Chicago? Sutton is not slinky, sexy, or seductive- which are three qualities needed in the roles mentioned so far. Cassie in A Chorus Line could possibly work when she gets older. As for things on Broadway right now, I think that she would make a great Peggy in 42nd Street. It would be lots of fun to see a brunette in the role, and I think that she could be great. I've suggested this before, and I'm sticking to it! Otherwise, I think that she could pull off Louis in GYpsy.

#11

Is it time for Sutton to move on? What would we like to see her in next?

Posted: 7/14/03 at 5:35pm

Huh? Cabaret? Chicago? Sutton is not slinky, sexy, or seductive- which are three qualities needed in the roles mentioned so far. Cassie in A Chorus Line could possibly work when she gets older. As for things on Broadway right now, I think that she would make a great Peggy in 42nd Street. It would be lots of fun to see a brunette in the role, and I think that she could be great. I've suggested this before, and I'm sticking to it! Otherwise, I think that she could pull off Louise in GYpsy.

Updated On: 7/14/03 at 05:35 PM

#12

re: Is it time for Sutton to move on? What would we like to see her in next?

Posted: 7/14/03 at 5:41pm

You don't necessarily have to be slinky and sexy to play roxie and velma. I know the majority of the actresses play it that way, but roxie can be cute and coy without having to be drop dead sexy, and besides, Sutton's a strong actress and an amazing dancer she can pull it off.

#13

re: Is it time for Sutton to move on? What would we like to see her in next?

Posted: 7/14/03 at 5:41pm

You don't necessarily have to be slinky and sexy to play roxie and velma. I know the majority of the actresses play it that way, but roxie can be cute and coy without having to be drop dead sexy, and besides, Sutton's a strong actress and an amazing dancer she can pull it off.

#14

re: re: Is it time for Sutton to move on? What would we like to see her in next?

Posted: 7/14/03 at 6:38pm

"Sally Bowls" or Salad Bowls"? Please explain.

---

"Long live God!" (GODSPELL)

#15

re: re: re: Is it time for Sutton to move on? What would we like to see her in next?

Posted: 7/14/03 at 6:49pm

I think Sutton will make a good Louise in Gyspy too, but I live Tammy as that part! But I don't think the girl who is playing June is as good as Tammy, so maybe Sutton should play June! I think she would be better as June anyways! And I would love to see Sutton in Chicago too! That is one of my fav musicals and I think Sutton can pull off Velma or Roxie!

#16

re: re: re: re: Is it time for Sutton to move on? What would we like to see her in next?

Posted: 7/14/03 at 6:54pm

Any actress can act sexy and slinky. That's why it's called acting. Look at some of the people who've played Sally in Cabaret who aren't the stereotypical "sex kitten." EX: Jane Leeves, Susan Egan, Lea Thompson

#17

re: Is it time for Sutton to move on? What would we like to see her in next?

Posted: 7/14/03 at 6:57pm

I think the part of Roxie Hart will be open for re-casting sooner than anyone thought. Sutton might be a happy alternative!

---

"Long live God!" (GODSPELL)

#18

re: re: Is it time for Sutton to move on? What would we like to see her in next?

Posted: 7/14/03 at 6:59pm

Sutton would kick arse as Roxie. I say get rid of Griffith and let Sutton stut her shat.

#19

re: re: re: Is it time for Sutton to move on? What would we like to see her in next?

Posted: 7/14/03 at 7:04pm

"Stut her shat"????? Please translate!

---

"Long live God!" (GODSPELL)

#20

re: re: re: re: Is it time for Sutton to move on? What would we like to see her in next?

Posted: 7/14/03 at 7:05pm

strut her stuff moron, lol.

#21

re: re: re: re: re: Is it time for Sutton to move on? What would we like to see her in next?

Posted: 7/14/03 at 7:24pm

YOU have called me a "moron"? Well, I never!

---

"Long live God!" (GODSPELL)

#22

re: re: re: re: re: re: Is it time for Sutton to move on? What would we like to see her in next?

Posted: 7/14/03 at 7:26pm

you certainly have NEVER. PS: STREISAND RULES AND IS DOLLY FOREVER!!!!! mwuahahaha

#23

re: Is it time for Sutton to move on? What would we like to see her in next?

Posted: 7/14/03 at 8:53pm

Ooooooo e-nufffffffff....

---

I'm as jumpy as a virgin at a prison rodeo!

#24

re: re: Is it time for Sutton to move on? What would we like to see her in next?

Posted: 7/14/03 at 9:57pm

YEAH PJ! LOL

BTW, Sutton is leaving Millie in November. I think she should try working on a British accent and play Eliza Doolittle in a Revival of "My Fair Lady." LOL Oh man, I didn't even consider the fact that Julie was Eliza. Oops. Oh well, she can handle another Julie role.

---

"It's the little things; the details, that distinguish the Barbra Streisands from the Rosalyn Kinds."~Gilmore Girls~

Updated On: 7/14/03 at 09:57 PM

#25

re: re: re: Is it time for Sutton to move on? What would we like to see her in next?

Posted: 7/14/03 at 9:59pm

I think that Sutton would be awesome as Eliza. I really think she could be great. Her singing and acting abilities totally fit that role. Sutton definately has the comedic timing to pull off Eliza.