zainmax said: "Not sure about the next decade, but I imagine that the Shuberts and Nederlanders were also denied"
Understand, please, that what you are hearing about is the initial volley in one of thousands or maybe millions of suits against insurance companies. It is normal that at this stage everyone throws everything against the wall to see what sticks. I would not read too much into anything you've read. This will definitely still be going on a decade from now because it is too big a chunk of change to fade away. (Compare, for example, to the time it took to bring an end to the WTC insurance litigation. It ended a couple of years ago, and that was only one (or two, depending on if you believe Larry Silverstein or his insurers) building(s). Regarding the Shuberts, I don't know but it would not surprise me if they are self-insured with a blanket reinsurance contract that probably has not yet been triggered (and may not be). This is all a great deal more complex than the clickbait would tell you.
