Juliana's Journal - Entry #23 now online... — Page 4

Edited the post...though you said YOU hadn't read it. Oh well...internet is great...shorthand doesn't always translate.

Glad you have read, sorry I misunderstood what you wrote.

Was this the Vanderbilt Y, robbiej? Hmmm?

---

Bally's, 43rd and Madison.

I can say that cause I'm no longer a member!

And how is this ontopic, you say. Well...friends have been encouraging me to put together an evening of my hilarious sexual misadventures. Cause, for some reason, there are a lot!!!

I was going to intersperse them with showtunes.

---

OMG, robbiej---that was HILARIOUS! =)

---

Hello my lovelies.

Did you miss me?

Robbie, that was high drama hilarity. My first husband's name was Richard. I have no doubt it was he. Did yours have a tiny penis as well?

Namo, would you send your copy of Ayn Rand to Miss Juliana Ashley Hansen? She could throw herself into its dialectic over her Cobb Salads -- as long as she is not interrupted by the creative team telling her how talented she is.

I find the topic of anonymous, well casual, drug- and exercise-induced homosexual acts in steamrooms and toilets quite appropriate on a thread about Miss Juliana Ashley Hansen's on-line journal.

As ever,
Z

I like Zola too! She's funny. I feel sorry that she was married to a teenyweeny peeny man. As my gay friends say, I bet she was the top in that relationship anyway.

I hope Juliana makes it to the Actors' Studio and Jimmy Lipton can ask her "what's your favorite curse?" Mine is c*nt. I bet hers is too.

Zola writes: "I am not attempting to rile anyone. I am simply pointing out that not everyone has to agree that her journal has any merit whatsoever."

And also "I find the topic of anonymous, well casual, drug- and exercise-induced homosexual acts in steamrooms and toilets quite appropriate on a thread about Miss Juliana Ashley Hansen's on-line journal."


Well.. it's good that you are above being immature, bitter and obnoxious as to not rile anyone up.

Perhaps you should take your masturbatory antics to your secret hidden website and take a trip past the marshmallow pit of candyland and discuss it there...

Intellectual and sometimes even catty discourse is one thing, but these posts have become downright offensive without any regard for the people who might happen upon these threads.

You want to disrespect someone that's your right - but I would think that all of you..and yeah.. especially Namo, because (dare I say this) he comes off the most "mature" and not catty - would at least care about respecting those who visit this site a little more.

You (in this case Namo) talk about Juliana contributing to the female stereotype of having to be thin, etc.. and harming today's female youth image in the process.. What do you think all this banter does for today's youth?

You once wrote to BK on a thread that HE is part of the problem if he is publishing her journal.

Guess what? You aren't any better...

---

Folks - please take your personal sexual histories, etc. to private messages... This is a Broadway message board, visited by folks of all ages, etc. etc. and these unrelated things are best discussed elsewhere. I'd prefer not to start having to remove inappropriate postings, so best if they don't come up to begin with.

Thanks,

Rob

Updated On: 9/19/03 at 05:03 PM

Ronald, I never said she was perpetuating stereotypes. I said she was contributing to a harmful culture-wide message to young women, particularly would-be performers. I didn't say she invented it, I didn't say she was conscious of it. However, you WOULD THINK I said she went over the individual readers' houses and knocked carbohydrates out of their hands.

I think sex-positivity is a good thing, and that's not something I see as a problem at all, unlike most Americans. It would appear that people filled in a LOT of the blanks in robbie's post with their own feverish imaginations (go back and read it!), which is another thing I applaud. But the webmaster does not applaud it, and it's his ballfield.

---

Updated On: 9/19/03 at 05:12 PM

Michael..

You mean Jack, not Ronald.. but that's no matter...

You are right.. sexual positivity is a great thing... and forgive me for not going back and reading every single word you posted. The point was, that you made a point to illustrate (a few times) that anyone that wasn't part of the solution was part of the problem.

You, Michael are part of THIS problem.

My POINT, was that starting to mudsling explatives such as the C word is crossing the line. You can't have it both ways - preach the betterment of the world and then contribute to it's decay..

Well you can, of course - but THAT'S hypocrisy...

---

Michael..

I already told you, my name is Jack and it's not a pseudonym at all. As for my "guess" - it was nothing of the sort.

I think I have been rather civil. As civil as you have been when challenging you.

As for guesses to your last name... we could play wheel of fortune.. I'll take a "P"

---

As civil as I have been when challenging I?

I hate Wheel of Fortune. Didn't they cancel that? I know I lost interest once they got rid of the part where they bought tchotchkes.

And we should probably try to get the talk more theatery. The way Robbie turned a sauna escapade into Rose's Turn.

---

Updated On: 9/19/03 at 05:59 PM