Laura Bush Killed a Guy

I recently saw this one-woman show downtown at the Flea, and it is only playing through this weekend (8 July). Highly recommended.....funny, bizarre, tasteless, moving, endearing...a little bit of everything. Lisa Hodsoll is great and originated themrole in DC. Plus, fresh-baked cookies! I live in Dallas and wish someone would do it or bring it here so all my theater fan friends could see it. We are a blue city and a blue county in a sea of red, but pretty much everyone likes Laura Bush. I think she may have enough of a sense of humor to not be freaked out by it.

"To be clear: she really killed a guy in real life. This is a fact."

...and

"I don't know anything about the play but yes, she did (accidentally) kill a guy."

Yes and Yes. But so did Matthew Broderick, Brandy, Ted Kennedy, Rebecca Gayheart, and others.

It's not an irrelevant fact, but neither is it the focus. From the Times review cited above: But then deep down “Laura Bush Killed a Guy” is not a political satire but a romantic comedy about mutual redemption: “I’m the girl that sadness made,” Mrs. Bush concludes. “And then there’s George.”

By the way, even though the play is, more or less, a "romantic comedy", it raises a serious question that it does not necessarily answer, which was how did Laura Bush get off scot free when she blew right through a stop sign while drunk as a skunk and killed a HS classmate who may or may not have been her boyfriend?

John Adams said: "RaisedOnMusicals said: "By the way, even though the play is, more or less, a "romantic comedy", it raises a serious question that it does not necessarily answer, which was how did Laura Bush get off scot free when she blew right through a stop sign while drunk as a skunk and killed a HS classmate who may or may not have been her boyfriend?"

I understand your curiosity (and perhaps anger?). But again, not really relevant in regards to the show.

It doesn'tmake things better to know, and it certainly doesn't impart any sense of justice, but Mrs. Bush is not unique regarding her circumstances, and it would be incorrect to believe that she received 'special treatment' that was unparalleled. At the time, she was not a celebrity - she was an ordinary teenager, like any other unknown, ordinary person.

I found anexcerpt from the New York Times review ofher book,“Spoken From the Heart” to be enlightening. (see:https://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/28/books/28laura.html) Startat Paragraph 9...

After reading her words, and as an actor, try to place yourself into her 17-year-old self. Does that make any difference for you in how you view the circumstance? (Just curious.

I think if you had seen the play your response to my post would have been markedly different. Trust me, there’s no anger at all and I wish you knew how deliciously ironic that suggestion was