broadwaydevil wrote: Those are subjective statements. While I and, I'd venture a guess, most people on here would tend to agree with you, there are many with contrary opinions, but that doesn't make them any less valid... If you evaluate what's going on in either show basing your criticism on the techniques of lyric-writing, composition and play-writing, each is going to come up short. You may still like what you see, but both shows are flawed in all three departments. The pendulum swings closer to the objective side of the continuum when it comes to an assessment based on those criteria.
broadwaydevil wrote:Also, BEAUTY AND THE BEAST shouldn't be spoken in the same breath as THE LION KING. It's a far better show in just about every possible way. In different ways, BEAUTY AND THE BEAST is as flawed a show as THE LION KING. However, I suppose it could be argued that BEAUTY AND THE BEST is (perhaps not by the greatest of margins) a better show in terms of its book and score, although it lacks much of THE LION KING'S visceral theatricality when it comes to the staging of the piece. Fact is, thought, that both shows rely too much on spectacle to get from A to B, which can be (and is) satisfying in a sensory manner, but which are much less so when examining either show criticially.
Musical Cyberspace: a tribute to the musicals of Broadway and beyond.
Updated On: 5/5/12 at 12:15 AM