Machinal was ROBBED
Machinal was ROBBED#1
Posted: 6/9/14 at 2:52pmProbably should have won for Best Scenic Design, Definitely should have won for Lighting Design, Could have won for Costume Design (but I got no problem with Twelfth Night winning that), and should have won for Sound Design (but lost to a musical).
Machinal was ROBBED#2
Posted: 6/9/14 at 3:54pmSo were a lot of other people and shows.
Machinal was ROBBED#2
Posted: 6/9/14 at 4:17pm
No doubt.
Feel free to start threads about the ones you think were robbed so we can discuss.
Machinal was ROBBED#3
Posted: 6/9/14 at 5:09pmThat would be complaining and some on this board do not like it when you complain unless they agree with you. If they don't, they will rip you a new one for daring to voice your disapproval.
Machinal was ROBBED#4
Posted: 6/9/14 at 5:14pmI saw this and had mixed feelings about the show. I liked the staging, Lighting, but just could not get into it. There were much better shows.
Machinal was ROBBED#5
Posted: 6/9/14 at 5:50pm
I agree that MACHINAL was a very impressive production, but the ACT ONE set was just as impressive, the GLASS MENAGERIE lighting just as evocative and haunting, and MACHINAL did not lose to a musical as there are separate categories. And you can snark all you want, but LADY DAY AT EMERSON'S BAR & GRILL is a play with music.
It's not like something undeserving won in its stead. The Plays were very technically strong this year; MACHINAL was in great company.
Machinal was ROBBED#6
Posted: 6/9/14 at 11:24pmI'll really never understand how people can get worked up over best lighting. Honestly, who cares.
Machinal was ROBBED#7
Posted: 6/9/14 at 11:43pm
Well, that's not an ignorant statement.
In my opinion, lighting can make or break a show. It's an essential part of a great theatrical experience.
That said, I didn't get to see Machinal. I loved the lighting design of Glass Menagerie, though. Incredible work by Natasha Katz.
Machinal was ROBBED#8
Posted: 6/10/14 at 12:01amMy comment was not meant to imply lighting is not a skill nor am I saying it's not important to a show. What I am saying is that the average theater goer doesn't really care about who wins the best lighting Tony much less gets really worked up over it. To a few on here, it may be a big deal but I don't think those folks are representative of the broader theater going public.
Broadway Legend Joined: 5/28/05
Machinal was ROBBED#9
Posted: 6/10/14 at 12:05am
"I'll really never understand how people can get worked up over best lighting. Honestly, who cares."
In the past I made my living by doing theatrical lighting. I care. The lighting affects the entire show. Not only does the lighting enable you to see, but it also enhances the mood, sets the time, and in many cases suggests different locations on the stage at the same time without the use of scenic elements. A production is only the sum of its parts. No one part is any more or less important than the other. Don't poo-poo the lighting category simply because you have not taken the time to fully appreciate its value.
Machinal was ROBBED#10
Posted: 6/10/14 at 12:10amThe average theatre-goer isn't on a Broadway forum, either. The comment seemed antagonistic, initially.
Broadway Legend Joined: 6/5/09
Machinal was ROBBED#11
Posted: 6/10/14 at 4:14am
"And you can snark all you want, but LADY DAY AT EMERSON'S BAR & GRILL is a play with music."
That's hardly a cut-and-dried fact, inasmuch as other award groups placed it in the musical category.
Machinal was ROBBED#12
Posted: 6/10/14 at 9:03amFirst Date could've gotten some love in my opinion...it was actually such a cool show, and the set and lighting designs were interesting enough for a Tony nom. Krysta Rodriguez was stunning as well.
Videos



