#26
Posted: 2/24/10 at 9:05pm
"If you don't understand the difference between "I found much of the dialogue to be as witty. . ." and "you found THE dialgue as witty. . . " Well, I just can't help you to understand why that is exaggerating and twisting."
Yes, of course, that is quite a distinction. My apologies for not remembering your exact phrasing, and for incorrectly expressing your thoughts. Just for clarification, though, perhaps you could give a round figure of how much you mean by "much of." 60%? 80%? I must confess that I have trouble understanding how one could find even 1% of this dialogue as witty as Coward's, much less "much of." For that I apologize as well.
And I guess I was led astray as to the exact nature of your assessment of Beane and his play by another statement you made in the earlier thread, and which I should have cited in this one, to wit,
"It was just like modern Oscar Wilde or Noel Coward. And I thought it worked just about as well as they do -- perhaps more so."
I took this to mean that you thought Beane's play worked as well, or even better than Wilde's or Coward's.
But I'm glad you cleared things up for me. Thanks.
And in the spirit of friendship, I wish you more plays like "Mr. and Mrs. Fitch." And in the spirit of my own survival, I wish that somehow I miss them.
Incidentally, did you read Cindy Adams's review of the play? If so,I was curious as to what you thought of it.I don't think even one word of her columns is as witty as Coward or Wilde, but I do think she's as funny as all get-out.
Yes, of course, that is quite a distinction. My apologies for not remembering your exact phrasing, and for incorrectly expressing your thoughts. Just for clarification, though, perhaps you could give a round figure of how much you mean by "much of." 60%? 80%? I must confess that I have trouble understanding how one could find even 1% of this dialogue as witty as Coward's, much less "much of." For that I apologize as well.
And I guess I was led astray as to the exact nature of your assessment of Beane and his play by another statement you made in the earlier thread, and which I should have cited in this one, to wit,
"It was just like modern Oscar Wilde or Noel Coward. And I thought it worked just about as well as they do -- perhaps more so."
I took this to mean that you thought Beane's play worked as well, or even better than Wilde's or Coward's.
But I'm glad you cleared things up for me. Thanks.
And in the spirit of friendship, I wish you more plays like "Mr. and Mrs. Fitch." And in the spirit of my own survival, I wish that somehow I miss them.
Incidentally, did you read Cindy Adams's review of the play? If so,I was curious as to what you thought of it.I don't think even one word of her columns is as witty as Coward or Wilde, but I do think she's as funny as all get-out.