#51
Posted: 8/5/09 at 11:47pm
Their recommendation in a thread about Laurents is illusory of said arrogance.
"...illusory of..."?
I think you mean "illustrates."
To say that mentioning the two books is "illusory of arrogance" means any perceived arrogance is an illusion.
I am not arrogant...at least not compared to people who misuse highfalutin' words. Now THAT'S arrogant!
Arthur's book suffer from a lack of coherence and an (arrogant) egomania that comes from deep inside him, where the worms crawl about.
But to say they're more entertaining than Maureen Stapleton's HELL OF A LIFE...I don't think even Arthur would claim that.
Maureen's book is the ultimate theatrical memoir.
Hell of a Life (Hardcover) by Maureen Stapleton
"...illusory of..."?
I think you mean "illustrates."
To say that mentioning the two books is "illusory of arrogance" means any perceived arrogance is an illusion.
I am not arrogant...at least not compared to people who misuse highfalutin' words. Now THAT'S arrogant!
Arthur's book suffer from a lack of coherence and an (arrogant) egomania that comes from deep inside him, where the worms crawl about.
But to say they're more entertaining than Maureen Stapleton's HELL OF A LIFE...I don't think even Arthur would claim that.
Maureen's book is the ultimate theatrical memoir.
Hell of a Life (Hardcover) by Maureen Stapleton
