I'll incite riots, but I was not a fan of her take on Ruth in WONDERFUL TOWN, accomplished as it was. I don't think she's inherently comic, and whereas the material that was a natural fit for a comic sophisticate like Roz Russell it seemed like an acting exercise for Murphy. Her vocals were so musically superior, however, it made her performance memorable, albeit for the wrong reasons (as when I saw Patrice Munsel in APPLAUSE, and she went into high soprano on "Hurry Back.") Listen to the CD with Murphy, then with Russell, and ask yourself which characterization better served. I'm not the only detractor -- Ken Mandlebaum famously provoked hate mail by raising the same issues. And a friend of mine who adores the show and flew in to see the show -- and lucked out, seeing La Murphy -- said "what the hell is all the hoopla about?"
So -- a question no one asks: I wonder if Murphy herself truly enjoyed WT. It's one thing to do an Encores, another to hang onto a run I'm not doubting her vocal problems, just wondering if it wasn't exascerbated by a built-in indifference to a role that wasn't the fit many assumed it to be. She is very much at home with KING and PASSION, and the Phyllis of FOLLIES.
The bottom line is Foster's, above, who rightly questions what all the secrecy was about. A damaged vocal chord is not a STD, but it was treated as if she had the most hush-hush condition imaginable. If the issue was vocal rest -- not an unknown problem on Broadway (go back to ZORBA, Heshel Bernardi had problems) -- why didn't they just take away the say so, and give her, say the Christine/PHANTOM schedule, or the one adopted by Victoria Clark in her 2nd year of PIAZZA. All the mystery and handwringing because she couldn't sing 8 shows a week?
"I'm a comedian, but in my spare time, things bother me." Garry Shandling