Okay.. it is clear that we are arguing two different approaches to working in the theatre.
Yours takes the strategy of only working when the role is deemed by yourself and others as "a significant career move".
While I believe, from observation, in the "working begets work" "pay-your-dues" approach. Emma Thompson and Maggie Smith started in sketch comedy. Bette Midler has singing in gay bathhouses on her resume. Many of the most successful careers have humble to embarrassing origins. Clearly there is more than one road to the goal of becoming a "working, respected, known actor."
Remember there was a time when working in movies was BENEATH a true actor.. as was working in vaudeville, musical comedies or television. Actors can really shoot themselves in the foot by not going where the work is.
From observation it seems that you get more "significant career move" choices the more you work. If you aren't working you get NO "career move" choices.
As for working on the WEST SIDE STORY tour. I suspect that there were A LOT of people auditioning for ANY role: therefore it is "highly sought after." "Well paying" and "respectable" are relative terms but I imagine it far more respectable for a performer to be making a living at his chosen craft then waiting tables and hoping for that elusive "significant career move" to drop out of the sky.
Of course at the end of the day...the real point is having worked in NAKED BOYS SINGING will not hurt your career. Perhaps not "help" it, but won't hurt it. And you can always omit it from your resume.
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people. - Eleanor Roosevelt
Updated On: 12/15/10 at 03:15 PM