I totally agree. You can't just take an actor and not give them a compelling or attractive "situation" to star in. You'd just have a "com" rather than a "sit com." Those go no where.
Even though the shows I mentioned were developed for the Broadway stars chosen to play them, those scripts and concepts were generated very likely BEFORE an actor came to mind. You have to find a good marriage of idea or "hook" as you called it, and personality. That goes with all shows on TV.
The problem is that Hollywood has proven again that they STILL don't get how important the basic writing and concepts are. They're all about star power now, and "putting the packaged deal together." And no, you can't just take Cenoweth or Butz or Lane and prop them up on the screen in ANYTHING and say, "Look, aren't they funny? We've got someone funny for you to watch!"
Bea Arthur would have failed as well, if "Maude" hadn't been so well written and conceived.
You gotta have a gimmick (as the song says) FIRST. Hopefully a fresh one, but it better be GOOD at least.
"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22