#1
Posted: 11/10/03 at 1:33pm
So I guess I really can't wait for the mother to die so he can become queen?
OT: Prince Charles??? A Faigelah?
#2
Posted: 11/10/03 at 1:37pm
Why is the media treating this like it's something new? His trysts with young men has been rumored for years.
http://www.danperezgallery.com
#3
Posted: 11/10/03 at 1:41pm
No surprise there. I believe that Camilla Parker Bowles is really a man in drag.
If anyone ever tells you that you put too much Parmesan cheese on your pasta, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
#4
Posted: 11/10/03 at 1:41pm
Trysts? with Boys?
I never heard that???!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I never heard that???!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
#5
Posted: 11/10/03 at 1:53pm
Edward, whose wife just had a baby, is generally known for his love affairs. The former servant who made this claim about Charles is known for his PTSD, alcoholic blackouts, racist comments to other staff members, and other allegations about his co-workers.
#6
Posted: 11/10/03 at 1:55pm
Well.... charles's ears WOULD come in handy ::wink wink::
#7
Posted: 11/10/03 at 1:58pm
What's PTSD?
If anyone ever tells you that you put too much Parmesan cheese on your pasta, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
#8
Posted: 11/10/03 at 1:59pm
What shocks me is that a servant this erratic would be hired by the royals in the first place.....I mean how does that happen?
How does a mental patient get this kind of access?
unless, he's not any of the things he is said to be...just telling the truth..
How does a mental patient get this kind of access?
unless, he's not any of the things he is said to be...just telling the truth..
#9
Posted: 11/10/03 at 2:00pm
voiceanth, maybe it's a case of keeping your friends close, your enemies closer??
If anyone ever tells you that you put too much Parmesan cheese on your pasta, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
#10
Posted: 11/10/03 at 2:12pm
post traumatic stress disorder, most likely
Sueleen Gay: "Here you go, Bitch, now go make some fukcing lemonade." 10/28/10
#11
Posted: 11/10/03 at 2:38pm
Actually, I think Lassy's observations are probably right.
And frankly, they would be far more damaging to Charles than the rumour that he was shtuppin' a hot manservant.
The latter would markedly improve his image.
And frankly, they would be far more damaging to Charles than the rumour that he was shtuppin' a hot manservant.
The latter would markedly improve his image.
"Christ, Bette Davis?!?!"
#12
Posted: 11/10/03 at 2:58pm
wait--what?? what have i missed? does anyone have a link to this story??
"I'll eat some breakfast then change the world."
"I hate you, and I hate your ass face!"
#13
Posted: 11/10/03 at 3:00pm
Does it matter?
In a way, I feel terribly sorry for the royal family. Many people work very hard to achieve fame, and I have less sympathy for them when their cleb status makes a private life difficult. For the Windsors, it's different. They are born into a spotlight, and stay there whether they want to or not.
I remember an interview from before the Royal Wedding, in which Prince Charles said that he couldn't marry any woman he loved, like anyone else could. He had to marry a woman that would make a suitable Queen. How sad. He can't choose his love any more than he can choose his life.
Gay, straight, or whatever, Charles deserves the same chances anyone else would have to be happy. What a pity that those opportunities aren't open to him.
In a way, I feel terribly sorry for the royal family. Many people work very hard to achieve fame, and I have less sympathy for them when their cleb status makes a private life difficult. For the Windsors, it's different. They are born into a spotlight, and stay there whether they want to or not.
I remember an interview from before the Royal Wedding, in which Prince Charles said that he couldn't marry any woman he loved, like anyone else could. He had to marry a woman that would make a suitable Queen. How sad. He can't choose his love any more than he can choose his life.
Gay, straight, or whatever, Charles deserves the same chances anyone else would have to be happy. What a pity that those opportunities aren't open to him.
"I hate musicals... People don't sing in real life."
"Well, maybe they should."
--Kiss of the Spider Woman (cut line)
"Well, maybe they should."
--Kiss of the Spider Woman (cut line)
#14
Posted: 11/10/03 at 3:02pm
Here you go WillParker
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1512&ncid=721&e=5&u=/afp/20031110/wl_afp/britain_royal_031110081412
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1512&ncid=721&e=5&u=/afp/20031110/wl_afp/britain_royal_031110081412
If anyone ever tells you that you put too much Parmesan cheese on your pasta, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
#15
Posted: 11/10/03 at 3:31pm
And I thought (at first glance) this was a thread about Port Charles. Oh, my--I only took a sip of the wine I'm cooking with--I swear!
D
D
#16
Posted: 11/10/03 at 3:34pm
Tesse, it does matter. If you are not gay you might not understand that to find out someone who is either admired or in a position of power is gay or may be gay, matters to those of us who are. It's kind of a validation thing that's too difficult to explain in a message board post. Basically, it's nice to be able to say to people "the person you admire so much is one of those gays that you dislike". You hope that maybe it will bring them around.
As far as Charles being able to live as he pleases, isn't it his family that maintains the ancient rules of behavior? He could do what ever he wants. An heir to the thrown once gave it up to marry a commoner that he loved. It's Charles choice to continue to live withing the constrictions of the royal familys traditions. Perhaps when he is King he'll change those things for good.
As far as Charles being able to live as he pleases, isn't it his family that maintains the ancient rules of behavior? He could do what ever he wants. An heir to the thrown once gave it up to marry a commoner that he loved. It's Charles choice to continue to live withing the constrictions of the royal familys traditions. Perhaps when he is King he'll change those things for good.
http://www.danperezgallery.com
#17
Posted: 11/10/03 at 3:34pm
Anthony Geary = Prince Charles!
#18
Posted: 11/10/03 at 4:04pm
Very valid points, Orion, and of course I wouldn't suggest that there shouldn't be gay role models. I'm just saying that if a person wants to have a life that isn't under a microscope, he should be able to.
And yes, if Prince Chas wanted to leave public life, I imagine he could give it a try, but I doubt he'd get very far. Opinion of governmental officials is very different from what it was when Edward abdicated to marry Wallis Simpson. Back then, the royal family commanded some respect. Today, the tabloids will publish any bit of gossip they can find, so long as it sells papers. If Charles announced that he would pass up the chance to wear the crown and go live as an ordinary citizen, I'm certain he'd still have papparazzi following his every move, and his face would still be on the covers of the tabloids.
As for my own sessuality (as Jack would call it), I enjoy my lack of celebrity and the privacy it ensures. :^) I will say, however, that I have enormous respect for the gay celebrities who have risked their careers to be honest about their private lives. Considering all the homophobia that somehow still remains in society, it's a dangerous move, and I'm glad that many actors have continued successfully since coming out.
I still look forward to the day when no one cares about other people's sex lives, and all of us, Princes and paupers alike, can live with whomever we love.
And yes, if Prince Chas wanted to leave public life, I imagine he could give it a try, but I doubt he'd get very far. Opinion of governmental officials is very different from what it was when Edward abdicated to marry Wallis Simpson. Back then, the royal family commanded some respect. Today, the tabloids will publish any bit of gossip they can find, so long as it sells papers. If Charles announced that he would pass up the chance to wear the crown and go live as an ordinary citizen, I'm certain he'd still have papparazzi following his every move, and his face would still be on the covers of the tabloids.
As for my own sessuality (as Jack would call it), I enjoy my lack of celebrity and the privacy it ensures. :^) I will say, however, that I have enormous respect for the gay celebrities who have risked their careers to be honest about their private lives. Considering all the homophobia that somehow still remains in society, it's a dangerous move, and I'm glad that many actors have continued successfully since coming out.
I still look forward to the day when no one cares about other people's sex lives, and all of us, Princes and paupers alike, can live with whomever we love.
"I hate musicals... People don't sing in real life."
"Well, maybe they should."
--Kiss of the Spider Woman (cut line)
"Well, maybe they should."
--Kiss of the Spider Woman (cut line)
#19
Posted: 11/10/03 at 4:21pm
Might I add that the two top news stories in England - Prince Charles' scandal and the trial of two murdered school girls - cannot be reported on our TV stations due to court orders preventing details being made public. So people can talk on opposite sides of the globe but not from a screen into our homes? It's ludicrous.
#20
Posted: 11/10/03 at 4:51pm
The libel laws are unreal in the UK!
#21
Posted: 11/10/03 at 5:45pm
Yeah Tesse, you're right about the papparazzi continuing to dog him. However, as far as the rules that govern who he can marry are within his control. It's a lot to give up, the throne of the United Kingdom.
And yes it would be nice if we didn't have to care about people's private sex lives. I have to admit I get very interested when someone is rumored to be gay and the source is reliable. It would be great though if it were so commonplace and accepted by everyone that we wouldn't give a crap anymore.
And yes it would be nice if we didn't have to care about people's private sex lives. I have to admit I get very interested when someone is rumored to be gay and the source is reliable. It would be great though if it were so commonplace and accepted by everyone that we wouldn't give a crap anymore.
http://www.danperezgallery.com
#22
Posted: 11/10/03 at 9:04pm
For him to cheat on Diana with Camilla shows he needs his head ( & eyes) examined
Poster Emeritus
#23
Posted: 11/10/03 at 9:12pm
Not at all, Roxy. Charles & Diana had no common interests. He was bored silly by her. Whereas he and Camilla shared a lot of the same interests which made her so much sexier to him.
"Christ, Bette Davis?!?!"
#24
Posted: 11/10/03 at 9:19pm
But he went into this marriage -- that means he should be faithful. He is a slime. I wish his boys become smart and rip their dad a new one.
#25
Posted: 11/10/03 at 9:46pm
So did Diana, Jon.
By that token, she's as slimy as he is. Or was.
By that token, she's as slimy as he is. Or was.
"Christ, Bette Davis?!?!"
Updated On: 11/10/03 at 09:46 PM
Tickets From $59
Tickets From $59
Tickets From $59
Tickets From $71