I had the pleasure of seeing PACIFIC OVERTURES last night, and I was pleasurably fulfilled: The show is nearly 3 hours, and to be honest - it drags minutely. The cast is absolutely wonderful. The music, as always, speaks beautifully. There are a good number of theatrical genius moments, be prepared. B.D.Wong was fabulous...absolutely phenomenal. Overall, see the show. (of course) It is a great night in the theatre, and it sure makes you feel bad for being an American. The way they portray people from other countries is thrillingly hilarious. Enjoy. -d.bj-
"Picture "The View," with the wisecracking, sympathetic sweethearts of that ABC television show replaced by a panel of embittered, suffering or enraged Arab women" -the Times review of Black Eyed
"Picture "The View," with the wisecracking, sympathetic sweethearts of that ABC television show replaced by a panel of embittered, suffering or enraged Arab women" -the Times review of Black Eyed
"The way they portray people from other countries is thrillingly hilarious."
Are you referring to the 'Please Hello" number?
"Smart! And into all those exotic mystiques -- The Kama Sutra and Chinese techniques. I hear she knows more than seventy-five. Call me tomorrow if you're still alive!"
I love this show! I got a chance to see a revival at the Promenade Theatre in 1984. I hope to see this production if I can get to New York in time. There is some really good music and some GREAT lyrics in this musical. Collection of Musicals Lyrics and Libretti
"Smart! And into all those exotic mystiques -- The Kama Sutra and Chinese techniques. I hear she knows more than seventy-five. Call me tomorrow if you're still alive!"
"Picture "The View," with the wisecracking, sympathetic sweethearts of that ABC television show replaced by a panel of embittered, suffering or enraged Arab women" -the Times review of Black Eyed
Is it really almost 3 hours? How close to eleven does it come down? I'm shocked, since I don't recall the original, or the small-scale revival, being so long. Perhaps they'll trim it down by 10-15 minutes, just tightening transitions and set movement; first previews are notoriously unpredictable -- and rarely reflect the ultimate running time.(I'm going on the 24th, selfishly, wonder if I can make the 11:11 train outta Penn... The next is 12:34.)
Is it visually stunning? One hopes for the Japanese imprint on the show's staging and design bring out new elements.
"I'm a comedian, but in my spare time, things bother me." Garry Shandling
Uh, I'm selfishly hoping I'll be able to make the last bus out of Port Authority. I don't want to choose between sleeping in the bus station and getting my poor parents to schlep to the city to pick me up.
I doubt it'll be a problem by the time I go see it, though.
OK, I was going to keep quiet, but having just read Auggie's post and Glebb's I have to pipe in "buyer beware."
Wong is totally miscast as The Reciter - a lightweight who lacks any command of the stage in a role that requires total authority. And no sex appeal, either.
This production lacks tostesterone and style and danger.
If you saw the original production, you will want to rush home and listen to the original Broadway cast to flush this production our of your consciousness.
Call me curmudgeon. I went this evening, and yes, I left at intermission.
I'm afraid I must agree with Jose that this revival is the most lackluster production of 'Pacific Overtures' that I have seen. I did not see the original but I saw the Promenade revival in 1984, a production in Palo Alto, CA (starring Francis Jue), a Chicago production a few years ago, and the all-Japanese Kennedy Center production, and this was the first time the show failed to move me. Bradd Wong is a fine actor, but he is miscast here. The reciter should be a commanding presence on stage, a bit frightening, and slightly mysterious. Wong is none of these. He is not even convincingly Japanese. Just because he is Asian doesn't mean that he's right for the part. It's like arguing that Carol Channing would be a good choice for Rose in 'Gypsy' because, y'know, they're both women after all. I saw the first preview and I am willing to cut the performers some slack since they may not have had time to fine-tune their performances but I think the whole production looked cheap. The standouts for me were Alvin Ing and Sab Shimono (both of the 1976 original) who do their best to hold this production together. In addition, Francis Jue was out sick so his understudy went on as the madam in 'Welcome to Kanagawa' and did a fine job (but why are the Geisha three women and one man dressed as a woman instead of all men dressed as women?) What happened to the Lion Dance at the end of act one? And one catty comment: it looks like Manjiro found a David Barton during his time in Massachusetts; he's quite the buffed boy. Totally wrong for the character but nice eye candy. Last comment: put me down on the side of hating Studio 54 as the venue for this show. It was one thing for 'Cabaret' but a show like 'Pacific Overtures' demands attention and people rattling ice and scraping chairs tends to distract from what's going on onstage. Of course I'll go back after the show opens to get another look (and see Francis Jue once he returns) but I'm not hopeful that this production will ever knock me out.
'Our whole family shouts. It comes from us livin' so close to the railroad tracks'
NOTE: I was not even alive for the original. So as an outsider, you may say, this was my impression. And B.D was wonderful, I thought. Yes, the show is visual. -d.b.j-
Ack, if that's true, I hope it gets pulled together during previews. Roundabout's Assassins was so good; I'd be seriously disappointed if they screwed up Pacific Overtures. But then again, I've never seen a production of the show, so maybe I won't be able to see a "screwup" when I see one. Hm.
Comparisons to the original '76 production are bound to be made. I happened to have seen that one 3, maybe 4 times. It's the only production of PO I've ever seen, before last night.
Let's not compare. From what I saw (Act One) of the current offering:
The show looks cheap, there are no two ways around that point in fact. The director does not have a clue on what makes the tension in the show work. Remove the tension, and the presentational style, and the entire show falls apart. Wong is wrong. [Say that aloud a few times and you'll sense the humor in the sentence.] I can't even begin to list the many reasons this is bad casting. "Welcome to Kanagawa," one of the highlights of the orignal, is presented as if it's a number in a drag show downtown. The pool of water, and the sound of the water, are distracting. Not nearly as distracting at the ridiculous headresses worn by Perry and the Americans. Hello? Let's upstage everything for no reason. Where was "The Lion Dance"? Surely, those pathetic steps was not it?
NOTE: If you happen to sit in the top right side of the Balcony, beware the lights that will shine in your face once the flag unfurls as the Americans arrive. I had to watch the entire scene with my Playbill shielding my eyes from the bright, white lights.
ADDENDUM: To sum up, my own expectations were not met, and that left me disappointed.
The hard work of the performers, miscast or not, is not to be dismissed lightly.
Now, obviously, I did not see the original, but based on the recording and pictures, it must have been quite something. I loved this production, but I might not have, had I seen it in 76.
The set and set pieces worked, I thought; simple, but enough so that it didn't upstage the story. I didn't have a problem with the water, as Jose' did; during "Four Black Dragons", it turns a deep red; very nice effect.
The costumes were very good (the ancient Japanese costumes at the beginning, the more modern dress at the end). The Americans (and all other foreigners, for that matter) had strangely-colored wigs and large noses. A distraction, yes, but clever enough, I suppose.
The orchestra was very good; percussion on the right especially. And, I must admit, sitting five feet away from Paul Gemignani and watching him conduct was fascinating.
Were the actors miscast? B.D. was, sure, but he did the best with what he could do, and did (I thought) a damn good job. He played The Reciter as an Emcee of sorts, but he switched from playing it like that and playing it as a serious narrator when he pleased. Hopefully he'll find the way to play it soon.
The issue of women in the show: In the original, women were only in the ending, "Next", correct? (Only what I've heard, please correct me if I'm wrong) In this, they have three women playing three of the four Kanagawa girls, Kayama's wife, Shogun's daughter (I believe), and others. It seemed strange to have them play some of the women, while characters like Shogun's mother, Kanagawa mother, and others are played as men, like they should be.
The staging/choreography was beautiful, and was distinctly Japanese. Everything was pretty seamless for a preview; no big problems. I'm hoping it can get even better, just to work out some of the other problems.
I, as I stated before, loved the show. Many people around me loved it as well. It quite possibly could be because I did not see the original production.
Already sounds disappointing. I am surprised about Wong. But perhaps I should not have been. Still, he had Sondheim's blessing. And I agree with Plum; ASSASSINS was so fully realized, I had high expectations for this. I'll lower them between now and 11/24. Sounds like the score is at least well served.
"I'm a comedian, but in my spare time, things bother me." Garry Shandling