You all have to look at both sides of the issue here. The management at TLC (Paige's bosses) could care less about Broadway Bares and its fundraising efforts. All they care about is bringing in advertising at TLC. "Trading Spaces" is their cash cow. If Paige, or any of their other on-air talent, do something "questionable," they risk tarnishing their show -- therefore losing advertising revenue for the company.
TLC caters to a mostly female, mid-American, conservative audience. Betty in CoonRidge, Tennessee wouldn't like her favorite make-over star out stripping. She might even quit watching the show. Multiply Betty several times. When advertisers see this loss in the ratings, they will start to pull their commercials, resulting in less money at TLC. Plus, the lower your ratings are, the less advertisers will dish out for a 30-second spot.
I think like most of you on here and applaude Paige's efforts at Bares. (It's still not confirmed this is even the reason her contract wasn't renewed.) Just keep in mind... Paige's striptease wasn't for a "good cause." The money raised from the selling of tickets TO the Bares performance is what was for a "good cause." Paige's star power was used to help sell tickets. She has a name that could be billed and help to bring in money. She could have worn a skimpy dress and performed a song or two and the event would have raised the same amount of money.
Morality clauses are a big thing in on-air talent contracts. Trust me, I know. It just floors me that some of you don't see there are two sides to this issue. After all, it's Show BUSINESS. The folks at Broadway Cares care about raising money for HIV and AIDS. The folks at TLC care about their bottom dollar, and if Paige or anyone else gets in the way of TLC making a buck -- they're gone.
"I'm not a catcher! I'm a piano player!" -- Schroeder from "Peanuts" ----- http://www.facebook.com/p/Brandon_Bartlett/500719306
Updated On: 1/26/05 at 09:02 PM