Question...

#1

Question...

Posted: 5/28/03 at 12:09pm

Should I put some code in to assign a default subject or something since I see a bunch of you are just putting . in there? Some sort of subject is required so the 'Classic View' of the board works as well as the modern one, but I can have it default to something if you leave it blank?

I wonder if that ramble makes sense. Oh well,

Rob

#2

Answer

Posted: 5/28/03 at 12:18pm

Yeah, it makes sense if you read it slowly a couple of times
A default subject would be nice if it can be done. It doesn't matter to me personally if I have to type in a subject but, there are those times when I forget and have to go back and feel almost on the spot to put in a witty or thoughtful subject line. That's a lot of pressure

---

http://www.danperezgallery.com

#3

yes

Posted: 5/28/03 at 12:30pm

yes, that would be a good idea, because even though I am not vulgar I sometimes catch myself writing curse words without knowing it. So your default would help those of us who accidently slip!

#4

Default to Original Message Title

Posted: 5/28/03 at 12:35pm

If no subject is entered, could you default to the original title of the thread? That would seem to make sense.

P.S. I personally like the Subject line. It makes it much easier to scroll through the entire thread quickly.

---

My perfect day would begin at on the beach in Hana, Maui and end at a Broadway Musical.

#5

.

Posted: 5/28/03 at 1:17pm

I don't always remember to put a subject... and usually I don't have one to put. Making it a default (such as maybe the original thread name) would make things easier

I was gonna ask about that, Rob! :)

---

"You're every gay man's wet dream!" ~ MA

If in Heaven you don't excel, you can always party down in hell...

#6

Re:

Posted: 5/28/03 at 1:58pm

I always get errors because I forget to put in the subject, then I have to click back and everything I typed is gone.

Maybe as a default put:

"Re: SUBJECT"

---

"The Spectacle has, indeed, an emotional attraction of its own, but, of all the parts, it is the least artistic, and connected least with the art of poetry. For the power of Tragedy, we may be sure, is felt even apart from representation and actors. Besides, the production of spectacular effects depends more on the art of the stage machinist than on that of the poet."
--Aristotle

#7

re: Question...

Posted: 5/28/03 at 2:07pm

Ok, if this works, it'll put in re: Subject You Were Responding to as a default.

Rob

#8

re: re: Question...

Posted: 5/28/03 at 2:09pm

WOO-YEAH it works! Rob's the best!

fyi though, for each additional reply it seems to add another "re:"

---

"You're every gay man's wet dream!" ~ MA

If in Heaven you don't excel, you can always party down in hell...

Updated On: 5/28/03 at 02:09 PM

#9

re: re: re: Question...

Posted: 5/28/03 at 2:12pm

re re re mi mi mi fa fa fa so so so la la la ti ti ti d'oh!

Sorry, couldn't resist.

---

"The Spectacle has, indeed, an emotional attraction of its own, but, of all the parts, it is the least artistic, and connected least with the art of poetry. For the power of Tragedy, we may be sure, is felt even apart from representation and actors. Besides, the production of spectacular effects depends more on the art of the stage machinist than on that of the poet."
--Aristotle

#10

re: re: Question...

Posted: 5/28/03 at 2:43pm

Thanks Rob - re:re indeed!

#11

re: REX:

Posted: 5/28/03 at 3:18pm

Great Soluiton, Rob! Defaulting to the specific message title in the chain your replying to should be very helpful.

Admittedly, Rex the Sheepdog, would have preferred REX: instead of re:

---

My perfect day would begin at on the beach in Hana, Maui and end at a Broadway Musical.

#12

re: re: subject

Posted: 5/28/03 at 3:31pm

You are SOOOO good @ this! Thanks so much!