#1
Posted: 11/22/08 at 2:33am
I really liked the show last Spring at Second Stage. I thought it needed work, but overall thought it was bold, exhilarating and off-beat (which I tend to favor).
I was hoping to see an "improved" production tonight, but I think the changes weaken the show. I spoke VERY briefly to Michael Greif during Intermission because I had to tell him that he directed my favorite musical of all time (aka GREY GARDENS) and let him know I had seen N2N in NYC. He asked me what i thought of the changes in Act I, and I told him what I missed. (Not that what I think matters.) He said he wanted to hear what I thought after Act II, but he was way too busy giving notes to the cast and crew afterwards, so I didn't bother him. But since he asked, I gave a lot of thought to why I didn't care for the changes.
In a nutshell, the story is much flatter and darker, which presents a problem because the strength of the piece was in its ability to lift you very high and then drop you so far below. Anyone who has experienced the birth and then loss of a child understands the vast contrast of those emotions--and how REAL it is; I felt the NY production did that very effectively. (I mean in no way to trivialize anyone else's experience regarding profound joy juxtaposed with abject sorrow by referencing my own.)
I felt before that the arc needed to be clearer and doing so was within reach, but I don't think that's been achieved with this production.
The performances were all wonderful. I think Booby Spencer will do quite well as Dan in the weeks to come. He sings the part beautifully, and he's such an able actor. For a first-time performance, it was really fine, but the power Brian D'Arcy James brought to the role just isn't there yet. There's not enough tension between him and Diana yet. But that's not really his fault. (More on that later.)
The young people in the show are so much more finely defined here than they were in New York, so the performances by Aaron Tveit, Jennifer Damiano and Adam Chanler-Berat are even more dynamic than before. All three seemed flawless to me tonight; whereas, at Second Stage they didn't all come across as convincingly. (Bravo to the "teenagers"!)
It may also have to do with the fact that most of the more drastic changes really have to do with the adult characters. Perhaps they're still developing and revising the grown-ups (although Michael Greif did not make it sound like they were still "reconstructing" the show at all at this point.) Whatever the reason, the conflict among the adults is weaker. I really like Louis Hobson. He has a lovely voice and a very strong presence, but it seems to me that they've tried to make the doctor less of a caricature and more a "third party" in a triangular relationship, which just doesn't work because it's confusing where the "triangulation" really is. Is it Diana/Dan/Dr. Madden? Diana/Dan/Gabe? Diana/Dan, Natalie, Dr. Madden/Gabe? The triangle becomes more of a trapezoid or a rhombus or something! (Geometry was NOT my best subject.)
I wish they had left in "Feeling Electric" because the first act ends most abruptly and there is no, "I wonder what's going to happen next" feeling during Intermission. I am not supporting the idea that ECT should be made fun of, but I think there is a way to make this number less about that and more about some of the more "questionable" aspects of current treatment in general. Some of the most effective drama is clothed in comedy, but it has to be very carefully executed.
I adore Alice Ripley and have been a fan of hers for ages. She can do no wrong, as far as I'm concerned. She's a great actress and a sensational singer. I'd pay to hear her read "Jonathan Livingston Seagull," so I will be back later in the run to see her in N2N...and to see how the show evolves from tonight forward.
I am curious to hear what anyone else who was there tonight thinks.
"Be on your guard! Jerks on the loose!"
http://www.roches.com/television/ss83kod.html
**********
"If any relationship involves a flow chart, get out of it...FAST!"
~ Best12Bars
I was hoping to see an "improved" production tonight, but I think the changes weaken the show. I spoke VERY briefly to Michael Greif during Intermission because I had to tell him that he directed my favorite musical of all time (aka GREY GARDENS) and let him know I had seen N2N in NYC. He asked me what i thought of the changes in Act I, and I told him what I missed. (Not that what I think matters.) He said he wanted to hear what I thought after Act II, but he was way too busy giving notes to the cast and crew afterwards, so I didn't bother him. But since he asked, I gave a lot of thought to why I didn't care for the changes.
In a nutshell, the story is much flatter and darker, which presents a problem because the strength of the piece was in its ability to lift you very high and then drop you so far below. Anyone who has experienced the birth and then loss of a child understands the vast contrast of those emotions--and how REAL it is; I felt the NY production did that very effectively. (I mean in no way to trivialize anyone else's experience regarding profound joy juxtaposed with abject sorrow by referencing my own.)
I felt before that the arc needed to be clearer and doing so was within reach, but I don't think that's been achieved with this production.
The performances were all wonderful. I think Booby Spencer will do quite well as Dan in the weeks to come. He sings the part beautifully, and he's such an able actor. For a first-time performance, it was really fine, but the power Brian D'Arcy James brought to the role just isn't there yet. There's not enough tension between him and Diana yet. But that's not really his fault. (More on that later.)
The young people in the show are so much more finely defined here than they were in New York, so the performances by Aaron Tveit, Jennifer Damiano and Adam Chanler-Berat are even more dynamic than before. All three seemed flawless to me tonight; whereas, at Second Stage they didn't all come across as convincingly. (Bravo to the "teenagers"!)
It may also have to do with the fact that most of the more drastic changes really have to do with the adult characters. Perhaps they're still developing and revising the grown-ups (although Michael Greif did not make it sound like they were still "reconstructing" the show at all at this point.) Whatever the reason, the conflict among the adults is weaker. I really like Louis Hobson. He has a lovely voice and a very strong presence, but it seems to me that they've tried to make the doctor less of a caricature and more a "third party" in a triangular relationship, which just doesn't work because it's confusing where the "triangulation" really is. Is it Diana/Dan/Dr. Madden? Diana/Dan/Gabe? Diana/Dan, Natalie, Dr. Madden/Gabe? The triangle becomes more of a trapezoid or a rhombus or something! (Geometry was NOT my best subject.)
I wish they had left in "Feeling Electric" because the first act ends most abruptly and there is no, "I wonder what's going to happen next" feeling during Intermission. I am not supporting the idea that ECT should be made fun of, but I think there is a way to make this number less about that and more about some of the more "questionable" aspects of current treatment in general. Some of the most effective drama is clothed in comedy, but it has to be very carefully executed.
I adore Alice Ripley and have been a fan of hers for ages. She can do no wrong, as far as I'm concerned. She's a great actress and a sensational singer. I'd pay to hear her read "Jonathan Livingston Seagull," so I will be back later in the run to see her in N2N...and to see how the show evolves from tonight forward.
I am curious to hear what anyone else who was there tonight thinks.
http://www.roches.com/television/ss83kod.html
**********
"If any relationship involves a flow chart, get out of it...FAST!"
~ Best12Bars
Updated On: 11/22/08 at 02:33 AM