#1
Posted: 5/17/05 at 6:29pm
I *knew* I heard the name Saycon Segleh or however it's spelled before.
Years ago, when I went to see WICKED, the following day I went to see AIDA. At the time, Michele T. Williams was starring in the role. However, she wasn't there for this performance, and the actress that performed 'Aida' that night was...
Saycon.
And she was AWFUL. I was excited that the announcement said an understudy (or standby) would be performing for Michele T. Williams. Too many pop stars had been stunt-cast in the role, so at last, I would potentially see someone who was familar in the role. WRONG! Vocals were not up to par with the rest of the female cast. Her acting was unemotional. I'll try and find my original review. She ruined what would have been a phenominal show for me. HOWEVER, she was tolerable. Just not what I consider to be a leading performer on Broadway. No spunk. No outstanding talent.
Just thought I'd share. She's the current "Elphaba," yes? This role would be better her. The voice isn't as demanding as "Aida."
Years ago, when I went to see WICKED, the following day I went to see AIDA. At the time, Michele T. Williams was starring in the role. However, she wasn't there for this performance, and the actress that performed 'Aida' that night was...
Saycon.
And she was AWFUL. I was excited that the announcement said an understudy (or standby) would be performing for Michele T. Williams. Too many pop stars had been stunt-cast in the role, so at last, I would potentially see someone who was familar in the role. WRONG! Vocals were not up to par with the rest of the female cast. Her acting was unemotional. I'll try and find my original review. She ruined what would have been a phenominal show for me. HOWEVER, she was tolerable. Just not what I consider to be a leading performer on Broadway. No spunk. No outstanding talent.
Just thought I'd share. She's the current "Elphaba," yes? This role would be better her. The voice isn't as demanding as "Aida."
"The Spectacle has, indeed, an emotional attraction of its own, but, of all the parts, it is the least artistic, and connected least with the art of poetry. For the power of Tragedy, we may be sure, is felt even apart from representation and actors. Besides, the production of spectacular effects depends more on the art of the stage machinist than on that of the poet."
--Aristotle
--Aristotle