Show choices for a mixed bag
#2
Posted: 5/25/13 at 8:26pm
not great actors???? sorry what
A play ???
A play ???
#3
Posted: 5/25/13 at 8:54pm
Seussical or Disney' Beauty and the Beast.
"There’s nothing quite like the power and the passion of Broadway music. "
#4
Posted: 5/25/13 at 9:11pm
sorry...you need great singers for Beauty and the Beast.
You need to give us little more to go on....is anything on the table?
Guys and Dolls springs to mind, You need one or two singers and the rest can be character singers.
You need to give us little more to go on....is anything on the table?
Guys and Dolls springs to mind, You need one or two singers and the rest can be character singers.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
#5
Posted: 5/25/13 at 11:03pm
What about Avenue Q? It has easy songs, no choreography, you can make funny voices/singing, and the puppets will do all the acting!
#6
Posted: 5/26/13 at 1:08am
But any show requires people that can act I am still confused why you would get people that can't act in a show. Even more confused why people are choosing musicals when they cannot sing ?
#7
Posted: 5/26/13 at 3:24am
I think taboo123 meant that they're just not great performers. They may be able to sing, dance or act, but only to a certain extent. They're probably not trained, I guess.
But I think it would be fun for them to do Avenue Q, because it's fun, silly and energetic.
But I think it would be fun for them to do Avenue Q, because it's fun, silly and energetic.
#8
Posted: 5/26/13 at 6:36am
It's a COMMUNITY theater. People that do theater because they love it.
If the actors can't act, how will the puppets be able to? You've actually just made their job HARDER.
If the actors can't act, how will the puppets be able to? You've actually just made their job HARDER.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
#9
Posted: 5/26/13 at 7:56am
Taboo, I would think the answer to your question depends more on the specific qualities of the people you expect are going to audition and what kinds of roles they might do a good or at least a decent, even if not a great, job with. It's a casting question that can only be answered with more information about who these people are. Their personalities, speaking voices, looks, etc. It can certainly be relatively enjoyable to see a show with people who are very well suited for the roles they are playing even if those people aren't great actors, dancers or singers; put differently, it's certainly a more palatable experience than seeing them take on roles that they aren't particularly right for. And it's certainly a lot more comfortable for the amateurs (a term I use with respect) themselves.
But it's very hard to answer the question without more information about them as individuals.
Certainly, there are professionals, even celebrities who aren't particularly great performers (especially on stage). Your question isn't all that different from the one the Weisslers ask when they have one available who wants to do one of their shows. What role might this person (relatively speaking) be a fun fit for.
Community theaters often choose shows because they know their regulars are right for them, whether or not their regulars are great performers.
But it's very hard to answer the question without more information about them as individuals.
Certainly, there are professionals, even celebrities who aren't particularly great performers (especially on stage). Your question isn't all that different from the one the Weisslers ask when they have one available who wants to do one of their shows. What role might this person (relatively speaking) be a fun fit for.
Community theaters often choose shows because they know their regulars are right for them, whether or not their regulars are great performers.
Updated On: 5/26/13 at 07:56 AM
#10
Posted: 5/26/13 at 8:12am
Yes I go its a community theatre. But I am not sure why you would to something you are not good at. If you cannot do gymnastics why would you do a musical that involves it? It just sounds strange
#11
Posted: 5/26/13 at 8:34am
So no one should do something just because they love it? HOgwash. They don't need to be stellar just to do something they love.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
#12
Posted: 5/26/13 at 9:19am
"But I am not sure why you would to something you are not good at."
Taboo didn't say the auditioners weren't good. He said they weren't great.
And as dramamam611 said many people love doing things they are not great at: not everyone who spends a lot of time golfing, making jewelry, baking or in a choir is great at it, although they might (or might not) be good at it. Or they might eventually be great or good and aren't yet. The same is true for acting, in this context, acting non-professionally.
The diff. between some other amateur pastimes engaged in by people who aren't particularly gifted and community theater, is that people actually pay to see community theater. Now not everyone wants to pay to see non-professional theater (which can sometimes be great but that's not the question here; for that matter, the professional theater we see is also not infrequently not great, including what we see on Broadway) but some people do, including people who want to support community theater, people who are involved in it, people who want to see people they know in it, etc.
Taboo didn't say the auditioners weren't good. He said they weren't great.
And as dramamam611 said many people love doing things they are not great at: not everyone who spends a lot of time golfing, making jewelry, baking or in a choir is great at it, although they might (or might not) be good at it. Or they might eventually be great or good and aren't yet. The same is true for acting, in this context, acting non-professionally.
The diff. between some other amateur pastimes engaged in by people who aren't particularly gifted and community theater, is that people actually pay to see community theater. Now not everyone wants to pay to see non-professional theater (which can sometimes be great but that's not the question here; for that matter, the professional theater we see is also not infrequently not great, including what we see on Broadway) but some people do, including people who want to support community theater, people who are involved in it, people who want to see people they know in it, etc.
Updated On: 5/26/13 at 09:19 AM
#13
Posted: 5/26/13 at 9:51am
>> Yes I go its a community theatre. But I am not sure why you would to something you are not good at.
Because it's a community theater and the "talent" is always dependent on the community. Community theaters don't always produce a show because their pool of participants is exceptionally talented. (Although I've seen some really competitive community theater troupes that DO have some really good up-and-comers.)
Many community theater troupes have adopted the model of requiring paid membership because of the fact that if they didn't, they wouldn't get their money back in ticket sales.
Given what the OP wrote about the level of talent involved, it seems like they're seeking to find a show that will please an audience (and fill the seats), even if the talent involved isn't really "audience pleasing". ...not sure that's a realistic goal.
Maybe it would be more beneficial for all involved to look at the reasons your troupe exists in the first place (to make money? to have fun? etc...), and then pick a show based on that criteria. If the audience shows up, they show up. If they don't, they don't.
Because it's a community theater and the "talent" is always dependent on the community. Community theaters don't always produce a show because their pool of participants is exceptionally talented. (Although I've seen some really competitive community theater troupes that DO have some really good up-and-comers.)
Many community theater troupes have adopted the model of requiring paid membership because of the fact that if they didn't, they wouldn't get their money back in ticket sales.
Given what the OP wrote about the level of talent involved, it seems like they're seeking to find a show that will please an audience (and fill the seats), even if the talent involved isn't really "audience pleasing". ...not sure that's a realistic goal.
Maybe it would be more beneficial for all involved to look at the reasons your troupe exists in the first place (to make money? to have fun? etc...), and then pick a show based on that criteria. If the audience shows up, they show up. If they don't, they don't.
Updated On: 5/26/13 at 09:51 AM
#14
Posted: 5/26/13 at 9:55am
Do BYE BYE BIRDIE. You really don't need anyone very talented for that show..
#15
Posted: 5/26/13 at 11:09am
Lord, you are clueless.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
#16
Posted: 5/26/13 at 11:15am
Or you could do ONCE UPON A MATTRESS. You really don't need much star quality in that show either. You need actors with pretty good comic timing ( queen and winnie, king) But OUAM is one of those shows that high schools do during a rebuilding year when all their insanely talented graduates have left. Its not a bad show but its a show that doesn't require amazing dancing or singing.
#17
Posted: 5/26/13 at 12:02pm
What about Hello Dolly? If you can find a legit soprano for Irene, or even a mezzo, the rest don't really have to be great singers, they just need a lot of personality.
But I agree with everyone else, we need more information in order to give you more useful suggestions.
But I agree with everyone else, we need more information in order to give you more useful suggestions.
#18
Posted: 5/26/13 at 1:52pm
A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum
Formerly: WishingOnlyWounds2 - Broadway Legend - Joined: 9/25/08
#19
Posted: 5/26/13 at 2:12pm
"If the actors can't act, how will the puppets be able to? You've actually just made their job HARDER."
I don't think so. I don't know about you, but when I saw Avenue Q, I was paying more attention to the puppets with their cartoony voices, rather than the actors controlling them. It's not that hard, anyone can put on a sock puppet and do it.
I don't think so. I don't know about you, but when I saw Avenue Q, I was paying more attention to the puppets with their cartoony voices, rather than the actors controlling them. It's not that hard, anyone can put on a sock puppet and do it.
#20
Posted: 5/26/13 at 5:24pm
wow. i stepped away for a while and was not expecting a full out deciphering! Thanks for the suggestions.
what i didn't elaborate on was this:
a friend is helping their student theater group at a college decide a season.
They struggle from year to year because they never know what kind of membership to reach- they have no theater department- so it's kind of like a student run club. They try very hard and as performers- they are limited. They would never attempt Sondheim, and don't have the capability to do large scale musicals. It needs to be a musical because no one would dare attend a play (as in- their student body). so you can say it is like a community theater--- they all love to do it-- and are passionate--but limited in talent....
any more suggestions? i'd like to compile a list ..
:)
what i didn't elaborate on was this:
a friend is helping their student theater group at a college decide a season.
They struggle from year to year because they never know what kind of membership to reach- they have no theater department- so it's kind of like a student run club. They try very hard and as performers- they are limited. They would never attempt Sondheim, and don't have the capability to do large scale musicals. It needs to be a musical because no one would dare attend a play (as in- their student body). so you can say it is like a community theater--- they all love to do it-- and are passionate--but limited in talent....
any more suggestions? i'd like to compile a list ..
:)
#21
Posted: 5/26/13 at 6:17pm
Avenue Q
Rock of Ages
American Idiot
Godspell
Hair
Hairspray
Mamma Mia
These could be good because they usually consist of a group of people singing together and creating a lively energy. Plus the songs are contemporary, and not Sondheim-y at all.
Rock of Ages
American Idiot
Godspell
Hair
Hairspray
Mamma Mia
These could be good because they usually consist of a group of people singing together and creating a lively energy. Plus the songs are contemporary, and not Sondheim-y at all.
#22
Posted: 5/26/13 at 6:21pm
Here are mix bag shows you should put on the list. These shows are fairly easy to put on and don't require MUCH talent or money.
Once Upon a Mattress
Your a good man charlie Brown
Bye Bye birdie
Pippin
Annie
Once on this Island
School House Rock
Les Mis ( lol jk)
The Fantasticks
Seussical
Godspelll
Wizard of oz
Once Upon a Mattress
Your a good man charlie Brown
Bye Bye birdie
Pippin
Annie
Once on this Island
School House Rock
Les Mis ( lol jk)
The Fantasticks
Seussical
Godspelll
Wizard of oz
Updated On: 5/26/13 at 06:21 PM
#23
Posted: 5/26/13 at 6:26pm
BroadwayStar4, Mamma Mia! and Rock of Ages are not yet available for public licensing because they are still on Broadway.
Updated On: 5/26/13 at 06:26 PM
BroadwayWorld TV
Ticket Central