I would call 12 nominations and no wins getting seriously blanked :p !!!
I know what you mean.. but don't forget the critics over here didn't like Wicked either.. and I don't think they were too impressed by Grandage's Evita from what I remember? I personally fail to believe that something can be nominated 12 times and fail to win any of them - unless the nominations themselves were undeserved in the first place!
Whilst I'm sure SITPWG was super - Jenna R is somebody I've met and workshopped with in the past - I find it hard to accept that people actually can look at an under-performing or unsuccessful musical and say 'oh, well, X musical may be not as good as Y, but the direction and lighting are measurably better'.. :p
It's my opinion that critics 'opt' to 'like' non-mainstream pieces for the sake of it, to appear more intellectual, even if these productions aren't necessarily more 'artistic' or 'serious'
Generally, rule of thumb, box office speaks for itself - look at Wicked's UK box office performance despite mixed reviews - yes, reviews and award wins make a difference to box office sales, but word of mouth is more important..
PS. by SITPWG being under-performing or unsuccessful, I mean in the box office, not artistically - limited run or not, shows will always extend nowadays if they are profitable!
Updated On: 9/20/08 at 01:40 PM