I saw Little Women last weekend also. And, I agree with Spider and Elphie's reviews. It really was an excellent musical. The acting talent was amazing. The set, the songs, etc. were very good.
But, I agree about the problem with Amy. I did find her voice and character portrayal annoying. But, more importantly, it was not believable. It has been a long time since I read the "Little Women" novel. But, I remember the book taking place over several years. According to the show's program, the musical is condensed to only take place over 2 years (1864-1866). So, when Amy is introduced in the first scene, she appears to be about 12 years old (at least that's how she acts - and that seems right when you assume that she has 3 older sisters, the oldest of which is probably around 1

. Then, two years later at the end of the show, the character looks and acts like she's about 14. I couldn't believe that a 14-year-old could have matured into a woman, fallen in love, and gotten engaged (even in the 1860's). It just didn't make sense. And, I think it's a flaw in the show. They should have had the second act of the show happen about 5 years later than the first act of the show - with a new actress playing a more mature, 17-year-old Amy.
Just my opinion...
Does the player exist,In any human endeavour, Who's been known to resist Sirens of fame and possessions? They will destroy you, not rivals, not age, not success. - Florence in Chess