I do not plan on using this as an opportunity to once again go into the battle of what show is better, Q or Wicked, but I would like to say something in Q’s defense
Q is not the first Broadway show to use puppets first of all; other shows that come to mind include Little Shop of Horrors and The Lion King
One of the reasons I personally find Q so endearing is because the show has its merits because of the show itself. None of it’s cast members were stars in any sense of the word, most of them were/are making their Broadway debuts. No one knew who Lopez and Marx were; they were just kid composers with no previously acclaimed theatrical endeavors. It was not based on a movie or a book or a book based on a movie based on a book, it was based on an idea: What if there was a Sesame Street for adults?
And it worked. The premise worked and is still working successfully 5 years after its original fruitation.
But for people to say that Q is simple is really missing the point of what the show has evolved into. I’d be the first person to say that if the show’s only point was to make puppets say “the darnedest things”, I’d have outgrown of the show a long time ago. But the heart of the show goes much deeper. Somewhere in Act One of the show, you realize that you not only think the characters are funny, but you genuinely begin to care what happens to them. I’ve seen adults much older and more cynical than I am cry during Q songs “There’s a Fine, Fine Line” and “I Wish I Could Go Back to College”.
For me, Q is about one’s lost childhood. There are good times you had that can never come back the way they were. But you can grow and learn from your mistakes and try to live your life with purpose, even if you don’t know what your purpose on Earth is.
And as much as I am a fan of Stephen Schwartz, and of Wicked for that matter, Q has always been closer to my heart because its story rings truer for me.
Updated On: 5/25/05 at 11:46 AM