Just a little note here -- and I don't mind at all the criticisms of the show, btw. You'd be surprised how many people I've met -- experienced theatergoers -- who PURPOSELY do not read the program ahead of time. They don't want to know anything about it until the lights go down, so that the piece completely speaks for itself. So, it's mistaken to assume that people who don't read the program are doing so because they're ignorant or negligent. I'm kind of the same way. I don't want the program telling me about the show. I want the show to tell me about the show. I read the program after I get home.
I'm personally very excited to see the show performed by great New York actors. They will bring things to it that we, frankly, do not, or cannot bring. While I think us doing it probably lends a little authenticity in the moment, there's nothing unusual about actors playing real life people on a stage. In fact, that's what they do anytime they get on a stage to perform a piece taken from real life. The only difference here is that we, being performers, opened the show ourselves.
Samuel French has licensed the musical for stock and amateur, so they obviously saw the piece as a musical that can stand independent of the authors. I don't see it as being that different from The Last Session, our first musical which was also based upon real people. The only difference was that the situation was fictional and we used different names.
I think audiences who come to the piece "new" will just accept what they see. I also know New York has the best actors in the world.
Bonus Round blog