Wick3 said: "BTW, what was the reasoning on discontinuing the Tony for Best Music Director?"
The Tony for Orchestrations came out of a quest to reinstate the Music Direction Tony, according to the video above. I THINK the short answer is: it's very hard to draw a line between the role of each member of the music team.
If it's a new musical, how involved was the composer in music decisions? Who's running rehearsals, and how much was notated in the score? Who's liaising with the arrangers/orchestrators/contractor? When the show opens, the conductor could differ night-to-night. If the quality of the playing and singing is being awarded, that's a collaboration between the contractor/MD/players/actors. If the size of the band is being awarded, the producer budgeted that (and the composer/orchestrator/MD likely weighed in). And the sound designer's work is also a factor. A show like An American In Paris, for example, was unique and had 9+ people in the music dept including a Score Supervisor/Arranger, Music Supervisor/Conductor, and Music Director.
I think 99% of the time, a Tony for Music Direction would go to either a revival with a big orchestra (South Pacific, Dolly, Follies) or the show that won Best Score. With the Orchestration award, 14 out of 23 years it has gone to the Best Score winner; 7 years it went to a show that didn't have an eligible score (revival or jukebox); Millie and Billy are the two outliers.
If anything, they could replace the Orchestration Tony with a group award for the music department (MD/Supervisor, Orchestrator, Arrangers, Contractor). But that could all be controversial...
(Similar arguments could be made about a Tony for Casting or Stage Management.)
Updated On: 9/18/18 at 06:30 PM