-------------------------------------------------------------
quote:
Why start a thread asking for opinions if you are just going to state your own like it's a fact? -------------------------------------------------------------
Oh, I'm sorry. I guess I have to put IMO, oh wait I'm sorry, IM
HO in front of everything I say for you to know that its only my opinion. LAME POINT, and that's a
fact. Unless in fact you're saying that I'm
so convincing that it sounds like I'm stating fact.
Yes, the movie is less "fun" than the show, but i think thats due to the "fluff-factor" of the show.
-------------------------------------------------------------
quote:
Thirdly, though you make a perfectly good argument, don't you think you ARE being a little bit harsh? Its fine to feel that way, but please try and keep in mind that that is your opinion, not fact! -------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you for noticing your faux pas, thats very mature of you if I do say so myself.
It may seem as though I'm being harsh, but that may be because this is coming up in a more sensitive time for TWS fans (which are a more broadway-board-active bunch) and I would say generally younger Broadway fans, almost comprised as the the puberty of the Wicked generation.
I understand saying that the movie seems more boring, comparatively speaking, but I do feel that by using the exact dialogue from the movie (much slower) in the show (fast-paced fluff) is a little unfair to the material and doesn't match up.
They are definetly separate entities, by all means, but I just feel that in telling this story the film is more entertaining, enthralling and funny (via delivery).
Updated On: 11/5/06 at 12:25 AM