Today's Performance of The Drowsy Chaperone (Suttons last) — Page 2
Posted: 4/15/07 at 9:40pm
Posted: 4/15/07 at 9:55pm
Posted: 4/15/07 at 9:59pm
I've gotta agree with those who said Sutton looked like she was just going through the motions. "Show Off" just didn't have that spark, and a couple of times she actually looked annoyed that she was having to do this again. Which made me sad...though for me it's always been Beth's show and she was red hot last night. Love her!!!!
LIVE THAT LESSON!!!!!!
Updated On: 4/15/07 at 09:59 PM
Posted: 4/15/07 at 10:04pm
Posted: 4/15/07 at 10:08pm
LIVE THAT LESSON!!!!!!
Posted: 4/15/07 at 10:12pm
Posted: 4/15/07 at 10:13pm
And, blindchameleon, I don't care about the stagedoor, I care about what's going on onstage. If she delivers on stage, she can exit on a helicopter for all I care.
Posted: 4/15/07 at 10:17pm
I can't figure out the Sutton thing, but something you should all keep in mind - Her character is supposed to be very diva like, and very much so the way you all are describing. Something to think about...
Posted: 4/15/07 at 10:23pm
And while I did go to the stage door, it was more for the others. Had Sutton come out, that would have been cool, but I wasn't like disappointed that she didn't. Nothing against her...I just wasn't expecting it.
LIVE THAT LESSON!!!!!!
Updated On: 4/15/07 at 10:23 PM
Posted: 4/15/07 at 10:25pm
I thought so too. Quite a departure from the role many of us grew up loving him in, and he's proved himself to be very versatile. He wasn't as natural in the role as Bob, but that's to be expected.
Congratulations on a Broadway debut well done, Mr. Crombie!!!
Updated On: 4/15/07 at 10:25 PM
Posted: 4/15/07 at 10:31pm
But this show belongs to Beth. She's the true star of this show. And it's such an honor to be able to meet her. She's an incredible person.
Posted: 4/15/07 at 10:43pm
Updated On: 4/15/07 at 10:43 PM
Posted: 4/15/07 at 10:53pm
But this show belongs to Beth. She's the true star of this show. And it's such an honor to be able to meet her. She's an incredible person.
I couldn't agree more!
Posted: 4/15/07 at 10:55pm
LIVE THAT LESSON!!!!!!
Posted: 4/15/07 at 11:00pm
Posted: 4/15/07 at 11:03pm
And Aldolpho went up on a line a improved some bizzare line that made him and Beth break. It was great.
Posted: 4/15/07 at 11:11pm
And if Sutton appeared to be a diva tired of being on stage, doesn't that mean she was playing the role right?
Posted: 4/15/07 at 11:16pm
My friend went to sing at Carnegie Hall and went to see this performance of Drowsy. I'll have to see what she says when she comes back on Tuesday.
Posted: 4/16/07 at 1:29am
Posted: 4/16/07 at 3:47am
Millie depended on Sutton. She was the show.
Drowsy is more of an ensemble piece, with the Man in the Chair being the big center of attention. Maybe she seemed tired with the show because she wasn't the main star...?
Posted: 4/16/07 at 4:21am
Now Jonathan Crombie on the other hand...what a cutie. He still has those cute "Gilbert Blythe" boyish looks and his performance was great! I thoroughly enjoyed him as the man in the chair. (Luckily, his chair was about 15 feet in front of me, so I had a great view of him!) I hope that he decides to continue his career on Broadway!
All in all, I thought the show was a lot of fun. Was it me, or did it seem like this audience was laughing A LOT? The woman next to me was in tears, as was I every time Danny came out on stage...
Posted: 4/16/07 at 6:36am
Posted: 4/16/07 at 6:24pm
Someone said she seemed like a "real btch" during "Fancy Dress." Umm... what does that even mean???? She comes on as a star near the end of the number, acts tactfully haughty and disdainful as she clears the floor and has her picture taken, then delivers less than two dozen words (and that's counting her last name as three separate words!). How can you say she's acting inappropriately??
No, she doesn't completely exhaust every opportunity for a laugh or applause by giving a big, splashy, in-your-face Aldolpho-like performance. There would certainly be room for that in this show, but I think Janet better the way she does it. It would be all too easy to play it for some big, har-har-har laughs by doing one of those standard goofy prima donna-type characters (think Sara Ramirez in "Spamalot" or any of the Carlottas or Dorothy Brocks you’ve ever seen). I’ve always found Sutton’s performance to be very refined and more subtle than what one might expect from a typical "diva" character. In fact, that's one of the main reasons Ben Brantley praised her so much in his otherwise lackluster review last year. (Not that I'm basing my opinions on what the critics say.... I'm just throwing it out there as an example because people who agree with me seem to be hard to pin down, and Brantley is a good example in this case.)
In this show, Sutton is full of these fun, subtle moves... her knowing half smile during her solo in "Fancy Dress," a quick raise of the eyebrows after she drinks the glass of water, her sly sideways glance while she lifts her leg. Come to think of it, hers is probably one of the most elegantly meta performances I’ve seen on stage in a long time, especially when you watch her delicate audience interaction during, "Bride’s Lament" or the last part of "Show Off." I’m not really trying to tell anyone that they’re wrong, because this is all obviously just my opinion, but I do suggest that the fact that a performer isn’t positively leaping off the stage with uncontrollable enthusiasm doesn’t necessarily indicate that they aren’t doing an incredible job to the best of their ability. In fact, in this case, I think it is an indicator of a higher (and more entertaining, if you let it) form of art.
Of course, we all know that the negative opinions that are so popular on this board tend to be in the minority with theatregoers overall. I’ve seen Sutton get big laughs and applause every night I’ve gone, so it’s nice to know that the general audience (and I include my humble self in that group) is still charmed.
And now, a word of hope to the rest of you: many of us on this board apparently differ in our opinion of what constitutes 110% and how it can be given, but I’m sure the Janet Van de Graaff you seem to be envisioning will find her day. If this show runs long enough, there will probably be future Janets who will "go all out" in the way that I think other people are hoping for. When these fourth and fifth-string replacements start filtering in with their voices bubbling, their smiles beaming, and their jazz-hands shaking so fast it’s just a blur, you can all be happy knowing that finally someone is unquestionably "giving it their all" ...at least physically, if not intellectually.
Meanwhile, I will happily remember the 10 joyous times (I had an understudy once out of eleven) when a Tony winner---a real actress--was doing the role and was able to excite me more by tossing one quick smirk and a flicker of the brow my way than anyone else could by doing the most fabulous cartwheels and energetic belting in the world. The sun will come out soon (maybe tomorrow... maybe in a few months), and it will probably be blinding. Enjoy.
Also, since we’re talking about Jonathon too, I saw him three times and thought he was excellent.
Posted: 4/18/07 at 9:45am
BroadwayWorld TV